Indexed in Journament

renewable agriculture and food systems

ISSN 1742-1705· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,203 of 29,317 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
12 Articles
Scores higher than 3.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name renewable agriculture and food systems
ISSN 1742-1705
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RAF

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 4.5
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 75.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 18.5
Timeliness 0.0 22.4
Diversity — 29.3
Innovation 4.5 32.1
Community Impact 2.9 15.2
Content Distribution 75.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (12)

2008
Economizing the use of nitrogen fertilizer in wheat production through enriched compost
Ahmad, Rizwan;Naveed, Muhammad;Aslam, Muhammad;Zahir, Zahir A;Arshad, Muhammad;Jilani, Ghulam
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 243-249
358 views
2015
kinetic study of cr(vi) adsorption on hydrotalcite mg/al with molar ratio 2:1
;Puji Kurniawati, Bayu Wiyantoko, Angga Kurniawan, Tri Esti Purbaningtias
Vol. 13 , No. 1-2 , pp. 11-21
254 views DOI Abstract
2015
community structure of riparian community of sematang borang river of south sumatera
;Yetty Hastiana
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 6-21
219 views DOI Abstract
2017
halaman depan
;Editor Eksakta
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. -
213 views Abstract
2012
segmentasi bayesian hirarki untuk model ma konstan sepotong demi sepotong berbasis algoritma reversible jump mcmc
;Suparman Suparman
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
213 views Abstract
2012
land suitability evaluation for horticultural commodities at the west part of upland lawu
;Puguh Karyanto;Rahayu Rahayu
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. -
208 views Abstract
2012
preparation and characterization of microporous activated carbon from oil palm shell by physical activation using purified nitrogen
;Allwar Allwar;Ahmad Md Noor;Moh Asri Moh Nawi
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. -
203 views Abstract
2013
uji aktivitas ekstrak etanol kulit buah apel ( pyrus malus, l) terhadap
;Suparmia, Khusnul Khotimah Amal Fadho
Vol. 13 , No. 1-2 , pp. 72-83
195 views DOI Abstract
2016
metode improved chaid (chi-squared automatic interaction detection) pada analisis kredit macet bmt (baitul mal wa tamwil)
;Muhammad Muhajir
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 55-63
194 views DOI Abstract
2012
senyawa aktif antiinflamasi dari kulit batang pasak bumi (eurycoma longifolia jack)
;Ari Widiyantoro;Indri Kusharyanti;Lia Destiarti;Elvi Rusmiyanto Pancaning Wardoyo
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. -
189 views Abstract
2017
halaman depan
;Editor Eksakta
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. -
213 views Abstract
2016
optimation of ethanol extract of centella asiatica and cresintia cujete composition as natural antioxidant source
;Mustofa Ahda;Fiqrirozi Fiqrirozi;Gina Noor Habibah;Mas Ulfah Lestari;Tomy Hardianto;Yuni Andriani
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 9-16
161 views DOI Abstract
2016
metode improved chaid (chi-squared automatic interaction detection) pada analisis kredit macet bmt (baitul mal wa tamwil)
;Muhammad Muhajir
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 55-63
194 views DOI Abstract
2015
community structure of riparian community of sematang borang river of south sumatera
;Yetty Hastiana
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 6-21
219 views DOI Abstract
2015
kinetic study of cr(vi) adsorption on hydrotalcite mg/al with molar ratio 2:1
;Puji Kurniawati, Bayu Wiyantoko, Angga Kurniawan, Tri Esti Purbaningtias
Vol. 13 , No. 1-2 , pp. 11-21
254 views DOI Abstract
2014
improvement of the product and quality of pogostemon cablin benth
;Allwar Allwar;is fatimah;noor fitri;dwiarso rubiyanto
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 34-41
19 views Abstract
2013
uji aktivitas ekstrak etanol kulit buah apel ( pyrus malus, l) terhadap
;Suparmia, Khusnul Khotimah Amal Fadho
Vol. 13 , No. 1-2 , pp. 72-83
195 views DOI Abstract
2012
senyawa aktif antiinflamasi dari kulit batang pasak bumi (eurycoma longifolia jack)
;Ari Widiyantoro;Indri Kusharyanti;Lia Destiarti;Elvi Rusmiyanto Pancaning Wardoyo
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. -
189 views Abstract
2012
land suitability evaluation for horticultural commodities at the west part of upland lawu
;Puguh Karyanto;Rahayu Rahayu
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. -
208 views Abstract
2012
segmentasi bayesian hirarki untuk model ma konstan sepotong demi sepotong berbasis algoritma reversible jump mcmc
;Suparman Suparman
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
213 views Abstract
Journament Score
24.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,203 of 29,317 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

24.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

4.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.