Journal of food science and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#296 / 33,853
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

Journal of food science and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name J Food Sci Technol
Abbreviated Name j food sci technol
ISSN 0022-1155
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (110 total)

2019
Correction to: Effect of texturised soy protein and yeast on the instrumental and sensory quality of hybrid beef meatballs (Journal of Food Science and Technology, (2019), 56, 6, (3126-3135), 10.1007/s13197-018-3552-9)
Grasso S.
Vol. 56 , pp. 3136
394 views DOI
2016
more frequent clinic visits are associated with improved outcomes for children with nafld
;Carol Lam;Robert Bandsma;Simon Ling;Marialena Mouzaki
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Microencapsulation of green tea polyphenols by ionic gelation and spray chilling methods.
Cutrim, Camila Sampaio;Alvim, Izabela Dutra;Cortez, Marco Antonio Sloboda;
Vol. 56 , No. 8 , pp. 3561-3570
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of the content of bioactive compounds in cocoa beans during the fermentation process
Thamires Santos Melo;Tássia Cavalcante Pires;João Victor Pereira Engelmann;Alana Lúcia Oliveira Monteiro;Leonardo Fonseca Maciel;Eliete da Silva Bispo;Thamires Santos Melo;Tássia Cavalcante Pires;João Victor Pereira Engelmann;Alana Lúcia Oliveira Monteiro;Leonardo Fonseca Maciel;Eliete da Silva Bispo;
, pp. 1-11
376 views DOI Abstract
2018
Kinetic study of sulforaphane stability in blanched and un-blanched broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) florets during storage at low temperatures
Mahn A.
Vol. 55 , pp. 4687-4693
376 views DOI
2019
The effect of harvest time and varieties on total phenolics, antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of olive fruit and leaves
Özcan, M.
Vol. 56 , pp. 2373-2385
361 views DOI
2019
Preparation and characterization of carrageenan/silver nanoparticles/Laponite nanocomposite coating on oxygen plasma surface modified polypropylene for food packaging.
Vishnuvarthanan, M;Rajeswari, N;
Vol. 56 , No. 5 , pp. 2545-2552
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Utilization of flour from rice brokens in wheat flour chapatti: evaluation of dough rheology, starch digestibility, glycemic index and retrogradation behavior.
Gujral, Hardeep Singh;Sharma, Bharati;Singh, Pardeep;
Vol. 56 , No. 5 , pp. 2490-2500
356 views DOI Abstract
2014
Effect of six different cooking techniques in the nutritional composition of two fish species previously selected as optimal for renal patient’s diet
Castro-González I.
Vol. 52 , pp. 4196-4205
325 views DOI
2019
Effects of apple, orange and carrot pomace powders on gluten-free batter rheology and cake properties.
Kırbaş, Zahide;Kumcuoglu, Seher;Tavman, Sebnem;
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 914-926
324 views DOI Abstract
View All 110 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.