Indexed in Journament

Food science and biotechnology

ISSN 2092-6456· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,124 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 92.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Food Sci Biotechnol
Abbreviated Name food sci biotechnol
ISSN 2092-6456
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10068

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Food science and biotechnology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 57.9 24.5
Innovation 43.5 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 43.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2019
High-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography to set the analysis method of stearoyl lactylate, a food emulsifier.
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1669-1677
816 views DOI Abstract
2016
wacana kemadjoean di kelompok etnis sunda awal abad 20
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 171-182
659 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimization of process parameters for improved production of biomass protein from using banana peel as a substrate.
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1693-1702
471 views DOI Abstract
2019
Survival of an emerging foodborne pathogen: Group B (GBS) serotype III sequence type (ST) 283-under simulated partial cooking and gastric fluid conditions.
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 939-944
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
2016
Changes in total phenolic and flavonoid content and antioxidative activities during production of juice concentrate from Asian pears ( Nakai).
Vol. 25 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. 47-51
402 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of pepper tree () essential oil-loaded chitosan bio-nanocomposites on postharvest control of and quality evaluations in avocado () cv. Hass.
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 1871-1875
390 views DOI Abstract
2017
digital literacy among sriwijaya university lecturers
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 243-254
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Optimization of process parameters for improved production of biomass protein from using banana peel as a substrate.
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1693-1702
471 views DOI Abstract
2019
High-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography to set the analysis method of stearoyl lactylate, a food emulsifier.
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1669-1677
816 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enzymatic modification of daidzin using heterologously expressed amylosucrase in .
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 165-174
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Survival of an emerging foodborne pathogen: Group B (GBS) serotype III sequence type (ST) 283-under simulated partial cooking and gastric fluid conditions.
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 939-944
450 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of pepper tree () essential oil-loaded chitosan bio-nanocomposites on postharvest control of and quality evaluations in avocado () cv. Hass.
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 1871-1875
390 views DOI Abstract
2017
halaman awal
Vol. 47 , No. 1 , pp. -
19 views DOI Abstract
2017
digital literacy among sriwijaya university lecturers
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 243-254
340 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,124 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

57.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

43.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

43.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.