Food science and biotechnology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7962 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 hours ago

Food science and biotechnology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name Food Sci Biotechnol
Abbreviated Name food sci biotechnol
ISSN 2092-6456
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10068
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
High-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography to set the analysis method of stearoyl lactylate, a food emulsifier.
Park, Juhee;Kim, Hyondeog;Hong, Seungran;Suh, Hee-Jae;Lee, Chan;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1669-1677
786 views DOI Abstract
2016
wacana kemadjoean di kelompok etnis sunda awal abad 20
;Holy Rafika Dhona
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 171-182
612 views DOI Abstract
2019
Survival of an emerging foodborne pathogen: Group B (GBS) serotype III sequence type (ST) 283-under simulated partial cooking and gastric fluid conditions.
Zwe, Ye Htut;Goh, Zhu Hui Esther;Chau, Man Ling;Aung, Kyaw Thu;Yuk, Hyun-Gyun;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 939-944
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimization of process parameters for improved production of biomass protein from using banana peel as a substrate.
Kamal, Md Mostafa;Ali, Md Rahmat;Shishir, Mohammad Rezaul Islam;Saifullah, Md;Haque, Md Raihanul;Mondal, Shakti Chandra;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1693-1702
409 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of pepper tree () essential oil-loaded chitosan bio-nanocomposites on postharvest control of and quality evaluations in avocado () cv. Hass.
Chávez-Magdaleno, Mireya Esbeiddy;González-Estrada, Ramsés Ramón;Ramos-Guerrero, Anelsy;Plascencia-Jatomea, Maribel;Gutiérrez-Martínez, Porfirio;
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 1871-1875
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influence of ripening stage and cultivar on physicochemical properties, sugar and organic acid profiles, and antioxidant compositions of strawberries.
Hwang, Hyesung;Kim, Young-Jun;Shin, Youngjae;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1659-1667
359 views DOI Abstract
2016
Changes in total phenolic and flavonoid content and antioxidative activities during production of juice concentrate from Asian pears ( Nakai).
Jiang, Gui-Hun;Nam, Seung-Hee;Yim, Sun-Hee;Kim, Young-Min;Gwak, Hyun Jung;Eun, Jong-Bang;
Vol. 25 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. 47-51
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimization of submerged culture conditions involving a developed fine powder solid seed for exopolysaccharide production by the medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum
Liu, S.
Vol. 28 , pp. 1135-1145
310 views DOI
2017
digital literacy among sriwijaya university lecturers
;Alamsyah Alamsyah
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 243-254
286 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effects of two enzyme extracts of Aspergillus niger on green tea aromas
Ni, H.
Vol. 26 , pp. 611-622
285 views DOI
View All 21 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.