the aaps journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1753 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

the aaps journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name aaps j
Abbreviated Name aaps j
ISSN 1550-7416
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/12248
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2016
legitimising emerging power diplomacy: an analysis of government and media discourses on brazilian foreign policy under lula
;Rafael Mesquita;Marcelo de Almeida Medeiros
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 385-432
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
TCPro: an In Silico Risk Assessment Tool for Biotherapeutic Protein Immunogenicity.
Yogurtcu, Osman N;Sauna, Zuben E;McGill, Joseph R;Tegenge, Million A;Yang, Hong;
Vol. 21 , No. 5 , pp. 96
268 views DOI Abstract
2008
contenciosos brasileiros na organização mundial do comércio (omc): pauta comercial, política e instituições brazil litigation in the wto: trade mix, politics and institutions
;Daniel Arbix
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 655-699
245 views DOI Abstract
2011
"defesa" ou "segurança"?: reflexões em torno de conceitos e ideologias "defense" or "security"?: reflections on concepts and ideologies
;Héctor Luis Saint-Pierre
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 407-433
231 views DOI Abstract
2003
os cosmopolitas: kant e os "temas kantianos" em relações internacionais the cosmopolitans: kant and kantian themes in international relations
;Nour Soraya
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 7-46
226 views DOI Abstract
2011
o brasil e as operações de manutenção da paz da onu: os casos do timor leste e haiti brazil and un peacekeeping: the cases of east-timor and haiti
;Djuan Bracey
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 315-331
210 views DOI Abstract
2010
Points to consider when establishing drug product specifications for parenteral microspheres.
Kumar, Rajesh;Palmieri, Michael J;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 27-32
209 views DOI Abstract
2008
soberania imperial, espaços de exceção e o campo de guantánamo: desterritorialização e confinamento na "guerra contra o terror" imperial sovereignty, space of exception, and the guantánamo base: deterritorialization and confinement in the "war against terror"
;José María Gómez
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 267-308
203 views DOI Abstract
fragile cities: a critical perspective on the repertoire for new urban humanitarian interventions
;Manoela Miklos;Tomaz Paoliello
Vol. 39 , No. 3 , pp. 545-568
200 views DOI Abstract
2004
o mundo muçulmano em uma era global: a proteção dos direitos das mulheres the muslim world in a global age: protecting women's ights
;Mahmood Monshipouri
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 187-217
194 views DOI Abstract
View All 24 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.