Indexed in Journament

the aaps journal

ISSN 1550-7416· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,214 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 7.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name aaps j
Abbreviated Name aaps j
ISSN 1550-7416
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/12248

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 39.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.1 7.8
Content Distribution 69.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2016
legitimising emerging power diplomacy: an analysis of government and media discourses on brazilian foreign policy under lula
;Rafael Mesquita;Marcelo de Almeida Medeiros
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 385-432
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
TCPro: an In Silico Risk Assessment Tool for Biotherapeutic Protein Immunogenicity.
Yogurtcu, Osman N;Sauna, Zuben E;McGill, Joseph R;Tegenge, Million A;Yang, Hong;
Vol. 21 , No. 5 , pp. 96
294 views DOI Abstract
2008
contenciosos brasileiros na organização mundial do comércio (omc): pauta comercial, política e instituições brazil litigation in the wto: trade mix, politics and institutions
;Daniel Arbix
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 655-699
293 views DOI Abstract
2011
"defesa" ou "segurança"?: reflexões em torno de conceitos e ideologias "defense" or "security"?: reflections on concepts and ideologies
;Héctor Luis Saint-Pierre
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 407-433
282 views DOI Abstract
2003
os cosmopolitas: kant e os "temas kantianos" em relações internacionais the cosmopolitans: kant and kantian themes in international relations
;Nour Soraya
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 7-46
281 views DOI Abstract
2011
o brasil e as operações de manutenção da paz da onu: os casos do timor leste e haiti brazil and un peacekeeping: the cases of east-timor and haiti
;Djuan Bracey
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 315-331
256 views DOI Abstract
2006
o sistema político dos eua: implicações para suas políticas externa e de defesa influences of the american political system on us foreign and defense policies
;Antonio Jorge Ramalho da Rocha
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 53-100
241 views DOI Abstract
2010
epistemologia, história e estudos estratégicos: clausewitz versus keegan epistemology, history and strategic studies: clausewitz vs. keegan
;Eugenio Diniz
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 39-90
236 views DOI Abstract
fragile cities: a critical perspective on the repertoire for new urban humanitarian interventions
;Manoela Miklos;Tomaz Paoliello
Vol. 39 , No. 3 , pp. 545-568
234 views DOI Abstract
2008
soberania imperial, espaços de exceção e o campo de guantánamo: desterritorialização e confinamento na "guerra contra o terror" imperial sovereignty, space of exception, and the guantánamo base: deterritorialization and confinement in the "war against terror"
;José María Gómez
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 267-308
226 views DOI Abstract
2019
TCPro: an In Silico Risk Assessment Tool for Biotherapeutic Protein Immunogenicity.
Yogurtcu, Osman N;Sauna, Zuben E;McGill, Joseph R;Tegenge, Million A;Yang, Hong;
Vol. 21 , No. 5 , pp. 96
294 views DOI Abstract
2016
legitimising emerging power diplomacy: an analysis of government and media discourses on brazilian foreign policy under lula
;Rafael Mesquita;Marcelo de Almeida Medeiros
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 385-432
332 views DOI Abstract
2015
coalizões globais lideradas pelos estados unidos na guerra ao terror (2001-2011): para além do unilateralismo
;André de Mello e Souza;Rodrigo Fracalossi de Moraes
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 763-790
151 views DOI Abstract
2015
a cooperação dos brics na ciência, tecnologia e inovação: retórica e realidades
;Michael Kahn
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. 185-213
120 views DOI Abstract
2015
a deslegitimação do programa nuclear iraniano no discurso de benjamin netanyahu
;Bruno Mendelski de Souza
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 727-761
205 views DOI Abstract
2014
a modernização militar da china e a distribuição de poder no leste asiático
;Arthur Coelho Dornelles Jr.
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 145-170
132 views DOI Abstract
2014
a institucionalização de blocos de integração: uma proposta de critérios de medição
;João Carlos Amoroso Botelho
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 229-259
118 views DOI Abstract
2014
humanitarismo e a favela global: violência urbana e ação humanitária no rio de janeiro
;Carolina Moulin;Jana Tabak
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 43-74
138 views DOI Abstract
2012
reflexões sobre o lugar do esporte nas relações internacionais reflections on the place of sport in international relations
;Hugo Suppo
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 397-433
165 views Abstract
2011
"defesa" ou "segurança"?: reflexões em torno de conceitos e ideologias "defense" or "security"?: reflections on concepts and ideologies
;Héctor Luis Saint-Pierre
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 407-433
282 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
24.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,214 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

24.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

39.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.