Indexed in Journament

kējì fǎxué pínglùn

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.5/100
Journament Score
#11,385
Journament Rank
38
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name kējì fǎxué pínglùn
Abbreviated Name kējì fǎxué pínglùn
ISSN 0000-0000

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2014
洗錢犯罪與犯罪收益之定義──從United States v. Santos案看美國反洗錢法之新發展 “Proceeds” of Crime in Money Laundering: A New Breakthrough from U.S. v. Santos
Lin, 林志潔 Chih-Chieh;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 1-40
420 views Abstract
2012
ciencia de la informaciÓn y gestiÓn del conocimiento
;Maria Teresa Múnera Torres
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 57-64
391 views Abstract
2004
TRIPS 與羅爾斯的國際正義理論初探 The TRIPS Agreement and John Rawls’s Theory of International Justice
Wang, 王敏銓 Eric Min-Chiuan;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 163-184
333 views Abstract
2015
um estudo teÓrico das caracterÍsticas organizacionais que influenciam a gestÃo do conhecimento nas organizaÇÕes
;Rodrigo Valio Dominguez Gonzalez;Manoel Fernando Martins
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 14-34
331 views Abstract
2006
P2P網站經營者與其會員成立共同正犯之可能性 ― ezPeer與Kuro案之分析與檢討 Should P2P Website Operator Be Responsible for the Crime of P2P Downloader under Joint Criminal Enterprise Liability Doctrine? ― A Comment on ezPeer and Kuro
, P2P網站經營者與其會員成立共同正犯之可能性 ― ezPeer與Kuro案之分析與檢討 Should P2P Website Operator Be Responsible for the Crime of P2P Downloader under Joint Criminal Enterprise Liability Doctrine? ― A Comment on ezPeer and Kuro;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 45-73
310 views Abstract
2015
estratÉgias adotadas na implantaÇÃo do ensino À distÂncia por uma instituiÇÃo de ensino superior privada: um estudo de caso
;Neiva Feuser Capponi;Denis Dall Asta
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 226-239
307 views Abstract
2012
el cuadro de mando integral como herramienta de gestiÓn estratÉgica del conocimiento
;Patricia Rodrigues Quesado;Beatriz Aibar Guzmán;Lúcia Maria Portela Lima Rodrigues
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 70-102
260 views Abstract
2013
uma crise do capital humano na economia brasileira
;Carlos Antonio Gomes
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 192-209
249 views Abstract
2016
los estudios de mercado en apoyo a la exportaciÓn de servicios profesionales: estudio de caso de la inversiones gamma s/a
;Mercedes Sánchez-Sánchez
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 152-157
246 views Abstract
2015
estudo bibliomÉtrico dos principais modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos
;Talita Ferreira de Souza;Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes
Vol. 5 , No. Special , pp. 5-26
242 views Abstract
2016
13 liÇÕes de lideranÇa para construir uma empresa de excelÊncia
;Izabel Alinne Alves de Paula
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 261-266
13 views
2016
los estudios de mercado en apoyo a la exportaciÓn de servicios profesionales: estudio de caso de la inversiones gamma s/a
;Mercedes Sánchez-Sánchez
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 152-157
246 views Abstract
2016
a competÊncia em informaÇÃo em articulaÇÃo com a inteligÊncia competitiva no apoio ao alinhamento estratÉgico das informaÇÕes nas organizaÇÕes
;Vanessa Cristina Bissoli dos Santos;Camila Araújo dos Santos;Regina Célia Baptista Belluzzo
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 45-60
13 views Abstract
2016
seleÇÃo de tipos de fontes de informaÇÃo
;Claudia Carmem Baggio;Heloisa Costa;Ursula Blattmann
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 32-47
8 views Abstract
2016
gestÃo estratÉgica da informaÇÃo em coordenaÇÕes de cursos de graduaÇÃo de universidades pÚblicas federais
;Luzia Góes Camboim;Simone Bastos Paiva;Maria das Graças Targino
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 223-237
138 views Abstract
2015
um estudo teÓrico das caracterÍsticas organizacionais que influenciam a gestÃo do conhecimento nas organizaÇÕes
;Rodrigo Valio Dominguez Gonzalez;Manoel Fernando Martins
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 14-34
331 views Abstract
2015
expediente do vol. 5, nÚmero 2 de 2015 da pg&c
;Luciana Ferreira da Costa
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 254-263
4 views
2015
indicadores bibliomÉtricos da produÇÃo acadÊmica mundial sobre o conceito do trabalhador do conhecimento
;Fernando Fukunaga;Valeria Macedo;Neusa Maria Bastos Fernandes dos Santos;Fabio Câmara Araújo de Carvalho;Edgar Pitta de Almeida
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 42-56
85 views Abstract
2015
estudo bibliomÉtrico dos principais modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos
;Talita Ferreira de Souza;Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes
Vol. 5 , No. Special , pp. 5-26
242 views Abstract
2015
gestÃo e conhecimento nas ciÊncias sociais aplicadas: uma experiÊncia didÁtica relacionada ao ensino-aprendizagem da disciplina filosofia da administraÇÃo
;Roberto Bazanini;Nathalia Caroline Santana
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 64-84
138 views Abstract
34
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.