Indexed in Journament

kējì fǎxué pínglùn

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,538 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 19.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name kējì fǎxué pínglùn
Abbreviated Name kējì fǎxué pínglùn
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 64.5
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 32.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for kējì fǎxué pínglùn
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 64.5 25.7
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 32.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2012
ciencia de la informaciÓn y gestiÓn del conocimiento
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 57-64
413 views Abstract
2004
TRIPS 與羅爾斯的國際正義理論初探 The TRIPS Agreement and John Rawls’s Theory of International Justice
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 163-184
359 views Abstract
2015
um estudo teÓrico das caracterÍsticas organizacionais que influenciam a gestÃo do conhecimento nas organizaÇÕes
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 14-34
355 views Abstract
2006
P2P網站經營者與其會員成立共同正犯之可能性 ― ezPeer與Kuro案之分析與檢討 Should P2P Website Operator Be Responsible for the Crime of P2P Downloader under Joint Criminal Enterprise Liability Doctrine? ― A Comment on ezPeer and Kuro
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 45-73
336 views Abstract
2015
2012
el cuadro de mando integral como herramienta de gestiÓn estratÉgica del conocimiento
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 70-102
295 views Abstract
2013
uma crise do capital humano na economia brasileira
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 192-209
273 views Abstract
2015
estudo bibliomÉtrico dos principais modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos
Vol. 5 , No. Special , pp. 5-26
267 views Abstract
2016
13 liÇÕes de lideranÇa para construir uma empresa de excelÊncia
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 261-266
37 views
2016
a competÊncia em informaÇÃo em articulaÇÃo com a inteligÊncia competitiva no apoio ao alinhamento estratÉgico das informaÇÕes nas organizaÇÕes
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 45-60
32 views Abstract
2016
seleÇÃo de tipos de fontes de informaÇÃo
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 32-47
24 views Abstract
2016
gestÃo estratÉgica da informaÇÃo em coordenaÇÕes de cursos de graduaÇÃo de universidades pÚblicas federais
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 223-237
164 views Abstract
2015
um estudo teÓrico das caracterÍsticas organizacionais que influenciam a gestÃo do conhecimento nas organizaÇÕes
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 14-34
355 views Abstract
2015
expediente do vol. 5, nÚmero 2 de 2015 da pg&c
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 254-263
33 views
2015
indicadores bibliomÉtricos da produÇÃo acadÊmica mundial sobre o conceito do trabalhador do conhecimento
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 42-56
103 views Abstract
2015
estudo bibliomÉtrico dos principais modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos
Vol. 5 , No. Special , pp. 5-26
267 views Abstract
Journament Score
28.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,538 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

64.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

32.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.