estudo bibliomÉtrico dos principais modelos de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos
Clicks: 272
ID: 153932
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
272 views
39 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #10 of 38 articles by views in kējì fǎxué pínglùn
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This article aims to examine scientific production about project management regarding the most expressive maturity evaluation models in organizations. The present study is descriptive and exploratory, and has adopted a bibliometric analysis of the existing bibliographical portfolio. The research was carried out in ISI/Web of Science, Scopus and Scielo databases in order to find data for the period from 2010 to 2014. Articles including the most relevant key-words were analyzed quantitatively. The analysis of the data was based on descriptive statictics and, as a result, a profile of the publications was obtained.
| Reference Key |
souza2015perspectivasestudo
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Talita Ferreira de Souza;Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes |
| Journal | kējì fǎxué pínglùn |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.