Indexed in Journament

kastamonu eğitim dergisi

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,440 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
97 Articles
Scores higher than 57.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name kastamonu eğitim dergisi
Abbreviated Name kastamonu eğitim dergisi
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 66.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for kastamonu eğitim dergisi
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 66.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (97)

2015
the eco-innovation parks: vectors of transition to a green economy
Vol. 1 , No. Special Issue ECO-TREND 2015 , pp. 27 -35
811 views Abstract
2014
the strategy of financing the environmental projects through the national action plan for environment in romania
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 70-73
511 views Abstract
2011
the evolution of consumer price index (cpi) and inflation rate in romania in january 2000 - december 2010
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 179 -185
419 views Abstract
2014
study concerning the assessment and evaluation of human factor in s.c. hidroelectrica s.a., curtea de argeȘ
, No. 4 , pp. 199 -206
401 views Abstract
2015
study on company security policies from digital media
Vol. 1 , No. Special Issue ECO-TREND 2015 , pp. 291 -296
389 views Abstract
2018
evolution of gross minimum wage increase economy in romania
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 97-104
366 views Abstract
2012
the possibility of statistical evaluation of innovative activity
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 224-228
361 views Abstract
2014
analysis model using robu mironiuc in predicting risk of bankruptcy romanian companies
, No. 4 , pp. 80-86
356 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of Usage Level of Current Issues in The Textbooks of Social Studies
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. -
135 views Abstract
2018
evolution of gross minimum wage increase economy in romania
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 97-104
366 views Abstract
2018
the advantages and disadvantages of bitcoin payments in the new economy
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 67-72
211 views Abstract
2018
2018
considerations regarding the financial stability and the macroprudential policy
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 130-138
225 views Abstract
2017
a few words about the automotive industry in romania and in europe
Vol. 1 , No. special issue , pp. 147-152
222 views Abstract
2017
financial stability policy – recent trends, challenges and perspectives
Vol. 1 , No. special issue , pp. 240-245
246 views Abstract
2017
the economic performance between the past, present and future
Vol. 1 , No. special issue , pp. 220-226
173 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,440 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.