considerations regarding the financial stability and the macroprudential policy
Clicks: 228
ID: 136449
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
228 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #40 of 97 articles by views in kastamonu eğitim dergisi
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The global financial crises from 2007 lead to profound transformations within the architecture of the process
of regulating and supervising the world’s financial system. The banking regulation framework has been consolidated
significantly all over the world, in order to reduce the credit institutions’ appetite for risk with the level of own capital
and to correct the excesses that promote the pro-cyclical behaviour of credit institutions. On this line, pre-eminence
had the new Accord Basel III on capital requirements, transposed into the European legislative framework package.
The new regulations came into force on 1st January 2014 and will be fully implemented by 1st January 2022. The
amendments are significant, this document dealing only with certain novelties related to the implementation of the five
capital buffers, i.e. the capital conservation buffer, the countercyclical capital buffer, the capital buffer for systemically
important institutions and the systemic risk buffer. The changes do not stop here. The European financial sector’s
micro and macro-prudential supervision architecture reformed, leading to the emergence of new institutions: European
Banking Authority, European Systemic Risk Board, the Single Supervisory Mechanism.
Romania has been involved in the entire transformation process. Even though it is not part of the Euro zone
and, therefore, it is not yet member of the Banking Union, meaning that it does not participate in the Single Supervisory
Mechanism, Romania has been connected to the process of remodelling of the banking regulation and supervision
framework which, at national level, adjusted along with the changes in the European environment. Currently, the
macro-prudential policy of the Romanian banking sector is, in terms of scope and instruments, lined up with the
European rules and practices.
| Reference Key |
cosmin2018analeleconsiderations
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;CURIMAN MIHAI COSMIN;MIHAI BOGDAN MĂDĂLIN ;ȚENEA ANDREI COSMIN |
| Journal | kastamonu eğitim dergisi |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.