Indexed in Journament

bjog : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology

ISSN 1471-0528· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,950 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
129 Articles
Scores higher than 86.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bjog
Abbreviated Name bjog
ISSN 1471-0528
URL https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14710528

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 63.9 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.0 4.6
Content Distribution 62.1 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (129)

2020
Primary surgical management of anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Slade, E;Daly, C;Mavranezouli, I;Dias, S;Kearney, R;Hasler, E;Carter, P;Mahoney, C;Macbeth, F;Delgado Nunes, V;
Vol. 127 , No. 1 , pp. 18-26
486 views DOI Abstract
2015
correlation between two chemiluminescence based assays for quantification of hepatitis b surface antigen in patients with chronic hepatitis b infection
;E Gupta;P Pandey;A Kumar;M K Sharma;S K Sarin
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 96-100
479 views DOI Abstract
2019
A systematic review on outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials on surgical interventions for female stress urinary incontinence. A call to develop a core outcome set.
Doumouchtsis, Stergios K;Pookarnjanamorakot, Patra;Durnea, Constantin;Mudiaga, Zini;Elfituri, Abdullatif;Haddad, Jorge Milhem;Falconi, Gabriele;Betschart, Cornelia;Pergialiotis, Vasilios;, ;
444 views DOI Abstract
2017
Maternal influenza and birth outcomes: systematic review of comparative studies
Fell DB;Savitz DA;Kramer MS;Gessner BD;Katz MA;Knight M;Luteijn JM;Marshall H;Bhat N;Gravett MG;Skidmore B;Ortiz JR;;
Vol. 124 , No. 1 , pp. -
436 views Abstract
2012
HIV care need not hamper maternity care: a descriptive analysis of integration of services in rural Malawi.
van den Akker, T;Bemelmans, M;Ford, N;Jemu, M;Diggle, E;Scheffer, S;Zulu, I;Akesson, A;Shea, J;
Vol. 119 , No. 4 , pp. 431-8
427 views DOI Abstract
2020
Parents' experiences of care following the loss of a baby at the margins between miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death: a UK qualitative study.
Smith, Lucy K;Dickens, Joanne;Bender Atik, Ruth;Bevan, Charlotte;Fisher, Jane;Hinton, Lisa;
400 views DOI Abstract
2014
investigation of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates
;Y Tanriverdi Cayci;A Y Coban;M Gunaydin
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 285-289
397 views DOI Abstract
2010
inducible clindamycin resistance in <i>staphylococcus aureus</i> isolated from clinical samples
;Deotale V;Mendiratta D;Raut U;Narang P
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 124-126
391 views Abstract
2019
Do we need reminders of the precautionary principle?
Agur, Wael;
384 views DOI Abstract
2018
antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of gram-negative bacteria causing infections collected across india during 2014–2016: study for monitoring antimicrobial resistance trend report
;Balaji Veeraraghavan;Mark Ranjan Jesudason;John Antony Jude Prakasah;Shalini Anandan;Rani Diana Sahni;Agila Kumari Pragasam;Yamuna Devi Bakthavatchalam;Rajesh Joseph Selvakumar;T N Dhole;Camilla Rodrigues;Indranil Roy;Sangeetha Joshi;Bhaskar Narayan Chaudhuri;D S Chitnis
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 32-36
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Chikungunya Infection in Pregnancy- Reassuring Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Observational Study
Foeller ME;Nosrat C;Krystosik A;Noel T;Gérardin P;Cudjoe N;Mapp-Alexander V;Mitchell G;Macpherson C;Waechter R;LaBeaud AD;;
, pp. -
254 views Abstract
2020
human papillomavirus infection rates before and after the introduction of prophylactic vaccines in kunming, yunnan, china
;Guiqian Z;Ziqin D;Ya X;Qiong W;Xin F;Limei B;Hongyan Z;Yi S
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 66-71
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Association of maternal attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and preterm birth: a cohort study.
Hesselman, Susanne;Wikman, Anna;Skoglund, Charlotte;Kopp Kallner, Helena;Skalkidou, Alkistis;Sundström-Poromaa, Inger;Wikström, Anna-Karin;
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
Parents' experiences of care following the loss of a baby at the margins between miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal death: a UK qualitative study.
Smith, Lucy K;Dickens, Joanne;Bender Atik, Ruth;Bevan, Charlotte;Fisher, Jane;Hinton, Lisa;
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
Primary surgical management of anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Slade, E;Daly, C;Mavranezouli, I;Dias, S;Kearney, R;Hasler, E;Carter, P;Mahoney, C;Macbeth, F;Delgado Nunes, V;
Vol. 127 , No. 1 , pp. 18-26
486 views DOI Abstract
2020
Management of mesh complications following surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.
Carter, P;Fou, L;Whiter, F;Delgado Nunes, V;Hasler, E;Austin, C;Macbeth, F;Ward, K;Kearney, R;
Vol. 127 , No. 1 , pp. 28-35
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
A case-comparison study of pregnant women with mitochondrial disease - what to expect?
Feeney, C L;Lim, A Z;Fagan, E;Blain, A;Bright, A;Maddison, J;Devine, H;Stewart, J;Taylor, R W;Gorman, G S;Turnbull, D M;Nesbitt, V;McFarland, R;
260 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Partogram - evidence based medicine is personal opinion based on fact.
Robson, Michael;
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
Generalizability of Economic Analyses.
Caughey, Aaron B;
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Do we need reminders of the precautionary principle?
Agur, Wael;
384 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,950 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

63.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.