Generalizability of Economic Analyses.

Clicks: 290
ID: 3934
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
As health care expenditures account for a greater share of the economy throughout the developed world, it has become increasingly recognized that economic analyses of healthcare interventions are important. Common economic analyses in healthcare include cost analyses, cost-benefit analyses, and cost-effectiveness analyses. A cost analysis examines the costs of the interventions and the downstream costs from the treatment as well, but doesn't not include outcomes. A cost-benefit analysis assumes that the outcomes are similar, and converts all treatments and outcomes into costs. A cost-effectiveness analysis provides the results as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The ICER has incremental costs in the numerator divided by incremental outcomes differences in the denominator. The gold standard for a cost-effectiveness analysis is to utilize quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in the denominator which allows CEA ratios to be compared between different clinical settings. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Reference Key
caughey2019generalizabilitybjog Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Caughey, Aaron B;
Journal bjog : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Year 2019
DOI
10.1111/1471-0528.15889
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.