The Partogram - evidence based medicine is personal opinion based on fact.
Clicks: 301
ID: 16667
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
62.8
/100
301 views
229 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #22 of 129 articles by views in bjog : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 129 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The article by Bonet (BJOG ……..) is not the first paper to challenge the benefit of the partogram and the 1cm/hour rate of progress. Although the conclusion is simple the evidence and methodology used is not convincing to those that use the partogram on a daily basis. The use of the partogram and normal progress of labour at ≥1 cm/hour are an integral part of the philosophy of Active Management Labour (AML) which has been practiced at the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin for the last 55 years. This philosophy which at best is often misunderstood and ignored and at worst misrepresented and misused has been shown to be associated with low caesarean section rates (CSR) in spontaneous labour and also reduce CSR when studied in randomized trials. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
| Reference Key |
robson2019thebjog
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Robson, Michael; |
| Journal | bjog : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/1471-0528.15911
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.