Do we need reminders of the precautionary principle?
Clicks: 370
ID: 3933
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
63.7
/100
370 views
265 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #9 of 129 articles by views in bjog : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 129 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In July 2018, Baroness Julia Cumberlege and her Review Team advised The Department of Health and NHS England to suspend the use of mesh tape procedures for incontinence. At the end of one of the Review's oral hearings this April, her views were challenged as they were suspected to be skewed, because she was 'only speaking to women who had poor outcome'. The answer came quick. 'We certainly believe in precautionary principle…First do no harm'. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
| Reference Key |
agur2019dobjog
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Agur, Wael; |
| Journal | bjog : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/1471-0528.15890
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.