Indexed in Journament

journal of photochemistry and photobiology c: photochemistry reviews

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,386 of 18,977 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
47 Articles
Scores higher than 40% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
This journal has not been published yet.

About This Journal

Short Name journal of photochemistry and photobiology c: photochemistry reviews
Abbreviated Name journal of photochemistry and photobiology c: photochemistry reviews

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of photochemistry and photobiology c: photochemistry reviews
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 29.9
Accessibility 15.0 19.8
Timeliness 50.0 42.2
Diversity 30.0 30.0
Innovation 40.0 38.3
Community Impact 36.5 28.6
Content Distribution 77.4 84.6
Content Quality 54.2
Ethics & Transparency 39.5
Editorial Standards 32.5
Publication Regularity 51.6
Geographic Reach 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (47)

2014
el uso de las tic y herramientas de la web 2.0 por maestros portugueses de la educación primaria y educación especial: la importancia de las competencias personales
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 241-255
253 views Abstract
2014
2012
emergencia y desarrollo temprano de la autorregulaciÓn en niÑos preescolares
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 15-34
231 views Abstract
2008
el asesoramiento científico educativo: un nuevo ámbito de mejora
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
216 views Abstract
2014
los massive open on line courses (moocs) como extensión universitaria
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 43-61
211 views Abstract
2008
el asesoramiento, el poder del profesorado y la voz del alumnado
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
210 views Abstract
2000
la formación del profesorado ante los retos de la multiculturalidad
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 0-
208 views Abstract
2014
metodología docente en las universidades europeas: la percepción de los erasmus
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 307-322
205 views Abstract
2015
el desarrollo normativo que regula las aulas escolares de nacionalidad extranjera
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 468-495
94 views Abstract
2015
las tic como ecosistema para la construcciÓn de la competencia intercultural
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 309-329
114 views Abstract
2015
efectos acadÉmicos, culturales, participativos y de identidad del aprendizaje-servicio en futuros maestros a travÉs de la educaciÓn fÍsica
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 280-297
199 views Abstract
2015
el perfil formativo del graduado en pedagogÍa: la visiÓn del alumnado
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 394-412
132 views Abstract
2014
la visión de los profesores eméritos sobre la universidad: un proceso de transición hacia la calidad
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 339-359
149 views Abstract
2014
formación permanente y desarrollo de la identidad reflexiva del profesorado desde las perspectivas grupal e individual
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 397-412
114 views Abstract
2014
entre la teoría y la realidad: opiniones y creencias del profesorado sobre la transmisión y fomento de hábitos saludables, a través del deporte y el juego, en la compleja relación escuela-familia
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 135-151
114 views Abstract
2014
2014
metodología docente en las universidades europeas: la percepción de los erasmus
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 307-322
205 views Abstract
2014
estudio de caso y aprendizaje cooperativo en la universidad
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 413-429
162 views Abstract
Journament Score
39.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,386 of 18,977 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.