Indexed in Journament

medicinal chemistry (shariqah (united arab emirates))

ISSN 1573-4064;1875-6638· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,310 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
111 Articles
Scores higher than 78.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Medicinal Chemistry a peer-reviewed journal, aims to cover all the latest outstanding developments in medicinal chemistry and rational drug design. The journal publishes original research, full-length/mini-review articles and guest edited thematic issues covering recent research and developments in the field. Articles are published rapidly by taking full advantage of Internet technology for both the submission and peer review of manuscripts. Medicinal Chemistry is an essential journal for all involved in drug design and discovery.
Short Name med chem
Abbreviated Name med chem
ISSN 1573-4064;1875-6638
URL https://www.eurekaselect.com/627/journal/medicinal-chemistry
Author Instructions https://www.eurekaselect.com/jms/index.html

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for medicinal chemistry (shariqah (united arab emirates))
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 37.0 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 74.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (111)

2019
Chemical properties and therapeutic potential of citral, a monoterpene isolated from lemongrass.
623 views DOI Abstract
2013
Synthesis of 1H-1,2,3-triazoles and study of their antifungal and cytotoxicity activities.
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. 1085-90
531 views Abstract
2020
Synthesis of Novel 1,2,3-Triazole Derivatives of Isocoumarins and 3,4-Dihydroisocoumarin with Potential Antiplasmodial Activity In Vitro.
514 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis and Evaluation of Antifungal and Antitrypanosomastid Activities of Symmetrical 1,4-Disubstituted-1,2,3-Bistriazoles Obtained by CuAAC Conditions.
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 400-408
477 views DOI Abstract
2010
effect of synthetic methods on the thermoelectrical properties of textured bi<sub>2</sub>ca<sub>2</sub>co<sub>1.7</sub>o<sub>x</sub> ceramics
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 89-94
474 views Abstract
2019
Preliminary anti-Coxsackie activity of novel 1-[4-(5,6-dimethyl(H)-1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]-3-alkyl(aryl)ureas.
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitory Potential of 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione Derivatives of Flurbiprofen, Ibuprofen and 4-tert-butylbenzoic Hydrazide: Design, Synthesis, Characterization, Biochemical Evaluation, Molecular Docking and Dynamic Simulation Studies.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 298-310
469 views DOI Abstract
2015
Regioselective synthesis of 2-chloroquinoline based ethyl 4-(3- hydroxyphenyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3- carboxylates and their in-silico evaluation against P. falciparum lactate dehydrogenase.
Vol. 11 , No. 8 , pp. 789-97
434 views Abstract
2017
Isolation of Chemical Constituents of Centaurea virgata Lam. and Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitory Activity of the Plant Extract and Compounds.
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 498-502
394 views DOI Abstract
2020
comparative analyses of the infiltration of al–cr–o and mg–cr–o refractories by molten phases in the copper-making process using the sessile drop technique
Vol. 59 , No. 1 , pp. 15-24
296 views Abstract
2020
Synthesis of Novel 1,2,3-Triazole Derivatives of Isocoumarins and 3,4-Dihydroisocoumarin with Potential Antiplasmodial Activity In Vitro.
514 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Introduction of Hydrazone, Hydrazide or Azepane Moieties to the Triterpenoid Core Enhances an Activity Against M. tuberculosis.
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antiglycation activity of triazole Schiff's bases against fructose-mediated glycation: In vitro and in silico study.
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Preliminary anti-Coxsackie activity of novel 1-[4-(5,6-dimethyl(H)-1H(2H)-benzotriazol-1(2)-yl)phenyl]-3-alkyl(aryl)ureas.
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chemical properties and therapeutic potential of citral, a monoterpene isolated from lemongrass.
623 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pyrrolopyrazoles: Synthesis, Evaluation and Pharmacological Screening as Antidepressant Agents.
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. 911-922
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improvement of the Anticancer Activity of Chlorambucil and Ibuprofen via Calix[4]arene Conjugates.
264 views DOI Abstract
2019
Activity Of (-)-Camphene Derivatives Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis In Acidic pH.
347 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,310 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.