Indexed in Journament

journal of chromatography b, analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences

ISSN 1873-376X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,853 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 42.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j chromatogr b analyt technol biomed life sci
Abbreviated Name j chromatogr b analyt technol biomed life sci
ISSN 1873-376X
URL http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chromb

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 54.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of chromatography b, analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 6.4 7.8
Content Distribution 54.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2019
Advances in capillary electrophoresis for the life sciences.
Vol. 1118-1119 , pp. 116-136
485 views DOI Abstract
2018
Simultaneous determination of six bioactive saponins from Rhizoma Panacis Japonici in rat plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS: Application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Vol. 1092 , pp. 199-206
444 views DOI Abstract
2015
Simultaneous determination of six bioactive constituents of Guizhi Fuling Capsule in rat plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS: Application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Vol. 1001 , pp. 49-57
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Determination of bisphenol A in canned food by microwave assisted extraction, molecularly imprinted polymer-solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Vol. 1137 , pp. 121938
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of chicken meat quality via rapid array isoelectric focusing with extraction of hemoglobin and myoglobin in meat sample.
Vol. 1128 , pp. 121790
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method to measure urinary metabolites of selected VOCs: Benzene, cyanide, furfural, furfuryl alcohol, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone.
Vol. 1126-1127 , pp. 121746
429 views DOI Abstract
2017
A UHPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of twelve constituents from Erigeron breviscapus extract in rat plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Vol. 1046 , pp. 1-12
415 views DOI Abstract
2016
Simultaneous determination of seven alkaloids in rat plasma by UFLC-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study after oral administration of Cerebralcare Granule.
Vol. 1017-1018 , pp. 28-35
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Determination of 10 Haloacetamides in drinking water by gas chromatography with automated solid phase extraction.
Vol. 1150 , pp. 122191
303 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sensitive and selective quantification of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in urine of the general population by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Vol. 1158 , pp. 122348
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
Preparative isolation of highly polar free radical inhibitor from Floccularia luteovirens using hydrophilic interaction chromatography directed by on-line HPLC-DPPH assay.
Vol. 1142 , pp. 122043
249 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and validation of a high-performance liquid chromatographic method with a fluorescence detector for the analysis of epirubicin in human urine and plasma, and its application in drug monitoring.
Vol. 1136 , pp. 121910
263 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determination of bisphenol A in canned food by microwave assisted extraction, molecularly imprinted polymer-solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Vol. 1137 , pp. 121938
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
LC-ESI-MS/MS quantification of carnosine, anserine, and balenine in meat samples.
Vol. 1132 , pp. 121826
222 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method to measure urinary metabolites of selected VOCs: Benzene, cyanide, furfural, furfuryl alcohol, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone.
Vol. 1126-1127 , pp. 121746
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Advances in capillary electrophoresis for the life sciences.
Vol. 1118-1119 , pp. 116-136
485 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of chicken meat quality via rapid array isoelectric focusing with extraction of hemoglobin and myoglobin in meat sample.
Vol. 1128 , pp. 121790
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determination of aflatoxins in milk sample with ionic liquid modified magnetic zeolitic imidazolate frameworks.
Vol. 1128 , pp. 121778
285 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,853 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

54.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.