Indexed in Journament

journal of nuclear materials

ISSN 0022-3115· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,186 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 48.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of nuclear materials
Abbreviated Name journal of nuclear materials
ISSN 0022-3115
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-nuclear-materials

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of nuclear materials
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 2.1 4.2
Content Distribution 66.5 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2017
designing acellular injectable biomaterial therapeutics for treating myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 212-226
365 views Abstract
2016
the promise and challenge of induced pluripotent stem cells for cardiovascular applications
Vol. 1 , No. 6 , pp. 510-523
339 views DOI Abstract
2016
extracellular matrix hydrogel promotes tissue remodeling, arteriogenesis, and perfusion in a rat hindlimb ischemia model
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 32-44
339 views DOI Abstract
2017
pravastatin but not simvastatin improves survival and neurofunctional outcome after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 149-159
324 views Abstract
2016
innovative therapeutics
Vol. 1 , No. 7 , pp. 557-567
319 views DOI Abstract
2017
dietary fat, sugar consumption, and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Vol. 2 , No. 5 , pp. 513-525
300 views DOI Abstract
2017
role of epinephrine and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the management of ischemic refractory ventricular fibrillation
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 244-253
285 views Abstract
2017
supercritical carbon dioxide–based sterilization of decellularized heart valves
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 71-84
283 views Abstract
2018
short-term hemodynamic effects of apelin in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 176-186
190 views Abstract
2018
diffusion tensor cmr
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 110-113
93 views DOI
2018
the multifunctional protein bag3
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 122-131
243 views DOI Abstract
2017
short-term administration of serelaxin produces predominantly vascular benefits in the angiotensin ii/l-name chronic heart failure model
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 285-296
200 views Abstract
Journament Score
31.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,186 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.