international journal of educational technology in higher education | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9296 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
40
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

international journal of educational technology in higher education

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name international journal of educational technology in higher education
Abbreviated Name international journal of educational technology in higher education
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?
Olaf Zawacki‐Richter; Victoria I. Marín; Melissa Bond; Franziska Gouverneur
5,323 views DOI
2020
Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map
Bond, M.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
986 views DOI
2019
Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam
Pham, L.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
589 views DOI
2020
Predicting academic success in higher education: literature review and best practices
Alyahyan, E.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
574 views DOI
2019
Feelings of satisfaction in mature students of financial accounting in a virtual learning environment: an experience of measurement in higher education
Herrador-Alcaide, T.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
464 views DOI
2017
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in higher education: an empirical study in Turkey, and the UK
Kurt, Özlem Efiloğlu;Tingöy, Özhan;
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
376 views Abstract
2019
Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis of social media use and education
Abrahim, S.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
353 views DOI
2017
Correction to: “From Making to Learning”: introducing Dev Camps as an educational paradigm for Re-inventing Project-based Learning (International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 10.1186/s41239-017-0061-2)
Chounta, I.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI
2019
A scaffolding toolkit to foster argumentation and proofs in mathematics: some case studies
Albano, G.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
317 views DOI
2018
Thematic analysis of the international journal of educational Technology in Higher Education (ETHE) between 2004 and 2017
Marín, V.
Vol. 15 , pp. 0-0
308 views DOI
View All 21 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
32
15
30
40
40
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

40.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.