Indexed in Journament

Journal of inorganic biochemistry

ISSN 1873-3344· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,126 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
119 Articles
Scores higher than 31.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Inorg Biochem
Abbreviated Name j inorg biochem
ISSN 1873-3344
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-inorganic-biochemistry

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of inorganic biochemistry
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 35.2 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 15.7 13.4
Content Distribution 44.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (119)

2016
background to the teaching-learning process of visual arts for appreciation of architecture in the second cycle
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 376-389
550 views Abstract
2011
The interesting DNA-binding properties of three novel dinuclear Ru(II) complexes with varied lengths of flexible bridges.
Vol. 105 , No. 3 , pp. 435-43
471 views DOI Abstract
2011
Synthesis, characterization and preliminary cytotoxicity evaluation of five lanthanide(III)-plumbagin complexes.
Vol. 105 , No. 3 , pp. 426-34
469 views DOI Abstract
2011
Synthesis, structural characterization, formation constants and in vitro cytotoxicity of phenanthroline and imidazolidine-2-thione copper(II) complexes.
Vol. 105 , No. 3 , pp. 329-38
458 views DOI Abstract
2011
Selective recognition of homocysteine and cysteine based on new ruthenium(II) complexes.
Vol. 105 , No. 3 , pp. 420-5
455 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pt(II) and Pd(II) complexes with a thiazoline derivative ligand: Synthesis, structural characterization, antiproliferative activity and evaluation of pro-apoptotic ability in tumor cell lines HT-29 and U-937.
Vol. 202 , pp. 110870
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Iron and other metals in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease: Toxic effects and possible detoxification.
Vol. 199 , pp. 110717
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antibacterial activity of metal complexes based on cinnamaldehyde thiosemicarbazone analogues.
Vol. 203 , pp. 110888
411 views DOI Abstract
2011
Synthesis, characterization and biological properties of cobalt(II) complexes of 1,10-phenanthroline and maltol.
Vol. 105 , No. 3 , pp. 339-47
406 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dual functions of iridium(III) 2-phenylpyridine complexes: Metastasis inhibition and lysosomal damage.
Vol. 205 , pp. 110983
364 views DOI Abstract
2022
Anion-selective "Turn-on" two color phosphorescent probes based on "Pd-Pd" interaction of a series of cyclometallated Palladium (II) complexes induced by a self-assembly in aqueous solution.
Vol. 239 , pp. 112083
132 views DOI Abstract
2022
Synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity of copper (II) complex containing a 2H-benzo[e][1,3]oxazin derivative.
Vol. 239 , pp. 112087
85 views DOI Abstract
2020
Controlling the reactivity of [Pd(N^N^N)Cl] complexes using 2,6-bis(pyrazol-2-yl)pyridine ligands for biological application: Substitution reactivity, CT-DNA interactions and in vitro cytotoxicity study.
Vol. 213 , pp. 111261
311 views DOI Abstract
2020
Metal-derived nanoparticles in tumor theranostics: Potential and limitations.
Vol. 209 , pp. 111117
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
Novel nickel(II), palladium(II), and platinum(II) complexes having a pyrrolyl-iminophosphine (PNN) pincer: Synthesis, crystal structures, and cytotoxic activity.
Vol. 205 , pp. 111015
316 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dual functions of iridium(III) 2-phenylpyridine complexes: Metastasis inhibition and lysosomal damage.
Vol. 205 , pp. 110983
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pt(II) and Pd(II) complexes with a thiazoline derivative ligand: Synthesis, structural characterization, antiproliferative activity and evaluation of pro-apoptotic ability in tumor cell lines HT-29 and U-937.
Vol. 202 , pp. 110870
430 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,126 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

35.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

15.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

44.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.