oil & gas science and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3815 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

oil & gas science and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name oil & gas science and technology
Abbreviated Name oil & gas science and technology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2010
Selection and Characterization of Geological Sites able to Host a Pilot-Scale CO2 Storage in the Paris Basin (GéoCarbone-PICOREF) Choix et caractérisation de sites géologiques propices à l’installation d’un pilote pour le stockage de CO2 dans le bassin de Paris (GéoCarbone-PICOREF)
É., Brosse;G., Badinier;F., Blanchard;E., Caspard;P.Y., Collin;J., Delmas;C., Dezayes;R., Dreux;A., Dufournet;P., Durst;S., Fillacier;D., Garcia;S., Grataloup;F., Hanot;V., Hasanov;P., Houel;C., Kervévan;M., Lansiart;M., Lescanne;A., Menjoz;M., Monnet;P., Mougin;B., Nedelec;A., Poutrel;X., Rachez;P., Renoux;C., Rigollet;V., Ruffier-Meray;S., Saysset;I., Thinon;A., Thoraval;S., Vidal-Gilbert;
Vol. 65 , No. 3 , pp. 375-403
450 views Abstract
2013
Sulfur Deactivation of NOx Storage Catalysts: A Multiscale Modeling Approach
N., Rankovic;C., Chizallet;A., Nicolle;D., Berthout;P., Da Costa;
Vol. 68 , No. 6 , pp. 995-1005
398 views Abstract
2006
DIMG92 : un simulateur de formation pour le procédé DIMERSOL Dimg92: a Training Simulator for the Dimersol Process
A., Nica;M., Capelle;F., Galtier;
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. 53-60
374 views Abstract
2019
The effect of impurity on miscible CO2 displacement mechanism
Erhui, Luo;Yongle, Hu;Jianjun, Wang;Zifei, Fan;Qingying, Hou;Liangtao, Ma;Shuhui, Dai;
Vol. 74 , pp. 86-
350 views Abstract
2006
Modification of Wax Crystallization in Petroleum Products Modification de la cristallisation des paraffines dans les produits pétroliers
J., Denis;P., Durand J.;
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 637-649
340 views Abstract
2011
Experimental Investigation of the Asphaltene Deposition Process during Different Production Schemes Étude expérimentale du processus de dépôt d’asphaltènes au cours de différents modes de production
M.B., Bagheri;R., Kharrat;C., Ghotby;
Vol. 66 , No. 3 , pp. 507-519
304 views Abstract
2006
Évolution des classifications et spécifications des huiles pour moteurs (situation en avril 1989) Evolution of Classifications and Specifications for Motor Oils (Situation April 1989)
J., Ayel;J., Richard;
Vol. 44 , No. 5 , pp. 611-671
300 views Abstract
2006
Description d'un nouveau brûleur compact. Fonctionnement en régime de gaz prémélangés Description of a New Compact Premixed Gas Burner
R., Minetti;J., Vandooren;P., Van Tiggelen;
Vol. 43 , No. 5 , pp. 673-692
298 views Abstract
2006
An Examination of the Multiphase Darcy Model of Fluid Displacement in Porous Media Examen du modèle polyphasique de Darcy de déplacement de fluides en milieu poreux
J., Wright R.;A., Dawe R.;
Vol. 35 , No. 6 , pp. 1011-1024
277 views Abstract
2016
Development of the Fischer-Tropsch Process: From the Reaction Concept to the Process Book
C., Boyer;J., Gazarian;V., Lecocq;S., Maury;A., Forret;J.M., Schweitzer;V., Souchon;
Vol. 71 , No. 3 , pp. 44-
238 views Abstract
View All 11 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.