Indexed in Journament

journal of non-crystalline solids

ISSN 0022-3093· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,606 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 19.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nombre Corto journal of non-crystalline solids
Nombre Abreviado journal of non-crystalline solids
ISSN 0022-3093
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-non-crystalline-solids

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of non-crystalline solids
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 72.7 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

1994
Calculation of the dc conductivity activation energy of ionically conducting glasses
Vol. 172 , pp. 1343-1352
316 views DOI
1992
1993
Calculation of the activation energy for ionic conduction in glasses
Vol. 160 , No. 1 , pp. 29-41
261 views DOI
1995
Extended-range order, interstitial voids and the first sharp diffraction peak of network glasses
Vol. 182 , No. 1 , pp. 40-48
256 views DOI
2015
effect of isothermal ageing on structural and magnetic properties of ni47mn40sn13 ferromagnetic shape memory alloy
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 29-38
249 views Abstract
2016
effect of grain size on the corrosion behavior of 304l stainless steel
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 61-72
247 views Abstract
1991
A unified mechanism for metal photodissolution in amorphous chalcogenide materials
Vol. 130 , No. 1 , pp. 85-97
240 views DOI
1991
Photodissolution of metals in chalcogenide glasses: A unified mechanism
Vol. 137 , pp. 1031-1034
229 views DOI
2018
polyol as a tunable method for synthesizing null and one-dimensional ag and ag-cu nanostructures
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 117-126
71 views Abstract
2017
the function of al2o3-tib2/fe composite reinforcements in aluminum matrix composites
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 23-35
90 views Abstract
2017
preparation of cobalt ferrite nanocrystallites by annealing of alloyed intermetallic co-fe and study of magnetic behavior
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 83-89
118 views Abstract
2017
in-situ synthesis of wc-co composite in wo3- co3o4- c system by carbothermic reduction method
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 121-130
185 views Abstract
2017
thermodynamic description of the ti–o system using the ionic liquid model for the liquid phase
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 73-85
11 views Abstract
2017
effect of dislocation density on deformation behavior of super strong bainitic steel
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 101-111
168 views Abstract
2017
friction stir welding of super duplex stainless steel of uns s32750, its microstructure evaluation, mechanical and corrosion properties
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 97-120
194 views Abstract
2016
Journament Score
29.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,606 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.