Royal Society open science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2451 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

Royal Society open science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name R Soc Open Sci
Abbreviated Name r soc open sci
ISSN 2054-5703
Aim and Scope
URL https://royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (56 total)

2018
New sporopollenin-based β-cyclodextrin functionalized magnetic hybrid adsorbent for magnetic solid-phase extraction of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from water samples.
Syed Yaacob, Syed Fariq Fathullah;Kamboh, Muhammad Afzal;Wan Ibrahim, Wan Aini;Mohamad, Sharifah;
Vol. 5 , No. 7 , pp. 171311
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
A hollow mesoporous carbon from metal-organic framework for robust adsorbability of ibuprofen drug in water.
Van Tran, Thuan;Cam Nguyen, Duyen Thi;Le, Hanh T N;Nguyen, Oanh T K;Nguyen, Vinh Huu;Nguyen, Thuong Thi;Bach, Long Giang;Nguyen, Trinh Duy;
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 190058
386 views DOI Abstract
2018
Towards open data blockchain analytics: a Bitcoin perspective.
McGinn, D;McIlwraith, D;Guo, Y;
Vol. 5 , No. 8 , pp. 180298
371 views DOI Abstract
2017
Defining the flexibility window in ordered aluminosilicate zeolites.
Wells, Stephen A;Leung, Ka Ming;Edwards, Peter P;Tucker, Matt G;Sartbaeva, Asel;
Vol. 4 , No. 9 , pp. 170757
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
Functionalization of 3-chloroformylcoumarin to coumarin Schiff bases using reusable catalyst: an approach to molecular docking and biological studies.
Kumbar, Suresh S;Hosamani, Kallappa M;Gouripur, Gangadhar C;Joshi, Shrinivas D;
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 172416
366 views DOI Abstract
2020
Graphene quantum dot electrochemiluminescence increase by bio-generated HO and its application in direct biosensing.
Yang, Shanli;Chu, Mingfu;Du, Jie;Li, Yingru;Gai, Tao;Tan, Xinxin;Xia, Binyuan;Wang, Shaofei;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 191404
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
growing of CoO nanoparticles on g-CN composites with highly improved photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution.
Liu, Xuecheng;Zhang, Qian;Liang, Liwei;Chen, Lintao;Wang, Yuyou;Tan, Xiaoqing;Wen, Li;Huang, Hongyu;
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 190433
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dissection of Bitcoin's multiscale bubble history from January 2012 to February 2018.
Gerlach, J C;Demos, G;Sornette, D;
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 180643
340 views DOI Abstract
2018
A data-driven approach for optimal design of integrated air quality monitoring network in a chemical cluster.
Zhu, Zhengqiu;Chen, Bin;Qiu, Sihang;Wang, Rongxiao;Wang, Yiping;Ma, Liang;Qiu, Xiaogang;
Vol. 5 , No. 9 , pp. 180889
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-contact respiration monitoring using impulse radio ultrawideband radar in neonates
Kim, J.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI
View All 56 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.