Indexed in Journament

türk kütüphaneciliği

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,012 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
28 Articles
Scores higher than 65.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name türk kütüphaneciliği
Abbreviated Name türk kütüphaneciliği

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 55.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.5
Content Distribution 55.8 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2008
Electronic Signature and Electronic Government Applications in Turkey: An Evaluative Essay from the Viewpoint of Electronic Records Management2 Türkiye’de Elektronik İmza ve Elektronik Devlet Uygulamaları: Elektronik Belge Yönetimi Açısından Bir Değerlendirme Denemesi
Altın, Esin;
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 279-295
477 views Abstract
2009
Research Trends in the Department of Information Management, Istanbul University 1967-2008: A Content Analysis of the Graduate Theses İstanbul Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü’nde Araştırma Eğilimleri 1967-2008: Lisansüstü Tezlerinin İçerik Analizi
Kayaoğlu, Hülya Dilek;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 535-562
408 views Abstract
2013
İstanbul Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü’nde Araştırma Eğilimleri 1967-2008: Lisansüstü Tezlerinin İçerik Analizi
Kayaoğlu, Hülya Dilek;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 535-562
387 views Abstract
2013
Opinions of Library Directors and Librarians on the Handover of Public Library Services to the Local Governments in Turkey
Faydalı, Özden Demircioğlu;Yılmaz, Bülent;
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 414-439
386 views Abstract
1996
Building Internet Search Engines Internet'te Tarama Sistemlerinin Kurulması
Akgül, Mustafa;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 244-264
386 views Abstract
2009
Information Resources and Libraries in Knowledge Production: Research through the Identifi cation and Analysis of Citations Bilgi Üretiminde Yazın Ürünleri ve Kütüphaneler: Atıfl arın Tespiti ve Analizi Yoluyla Araştırma
Tamdoğan, Oya Gürdal;
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 254-277
375 views Abstract
2007
Bibliometric Profile of Turkish Journal of Psychology Türk Psikoloji Dergisi'nin Bibliyometrik Profili
Al, Umut;Coştur, Recai;
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 142-163
342 views Abstract
2014
Arşiv ve Kütüphanelerdeki Risklere Yönelik Pasif Korumanın Önemi
Kuzucuoğlu, Alpaslan Hamdi;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 338-351
329 views Abstract
2010
Kütüphanecinin Felsefi Düşünme Eyleminin Önemi ve Etkileri
Alkan, Nazlı;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 596-643
325 views Abstract
2014
Karne Hediye Günü’ nde Somalı Çocukların Yüreğine Dokunduk
İleri, Aydın;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 368-370
321 views Abstract
2017
A Study on Education and the Organization of School Libraries in the Perspective of Total Quality Management
Aslan, Cengiz;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 251-258
256 views Abstract
2015
Ankara Üniversitesi ve Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Okuma Alışkanlıkları Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme
Alaca, Erdinç;Kızılöz, Tuğba;
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 515-543
155 views Abstract
2014
Arşiv ve Kütüphanelerdeki Risklere Yönelik Pasif Korumanın Önemi
Kuzucuoğlu, Alpaslan Hamdi;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 338-351
329 views Abstract
2014
Identification of Cyber Crimes in Turkey and Content Analysis For Infringements
Turan, Metin;Külcü, Özgür;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 18-46
216 views Abstract
2014
Karne Hediye Günü’ nde Somalı Çocukların Yüreğine Dokunduk
İleri, Aydın;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 368-370
321 views Abstract
2013
Customer-Centered Structuring in University Libraries and Personnel Satisfaction
Yılmaz, Erol;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 261-292
208 views Abstract
2013
Opinions of Library Directors and Librarians on the Handover of Public Library Services to the Local Governments in Turkey
Faydalı, Özden Demircioğlu;Yılmaz, Bülent;
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 414-439
386 views Abstract
2013
İstanbul Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü’nde Araştırma Eğilimleri 1967-2008: Lisansüstü Tezlerinin İçerik Analizi
Kayaoğlu, Hülya Dilek;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 535-562
387 views Abstract
2010
Kütüphanecinin Felsefi Düşünme Eyleminin Önemi ve Etkileri
Alkan, Nazlı;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 596-643
325 views Abstract
2009
Mimarlar Odası ve Türkiye Mimarlık Ortamına Katkıları
Cengizkan, N. Müge;
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 907-919
42 views
Journament Score
34.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,012 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

55.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.