Indexed in Journament

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)

ISSN 1364-548X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,185 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
184 Articles
Scores higher than 95.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Chem Commun (Camb)
Abbreviated Name chem commun (camb)
ISSN 1364-548X
URL http://www.rsc.org/chemcomm

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 71.7 24.5
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 69.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (184)

2014
adverse event versus medication error: perceptions of nursing staff acting in intensive care
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 725-734
626 views DOI Abstract
2018
mental health services: perception of nursing in relation to overload and working conditions / serviços de saúde mental: percepção da enfermagem em relação à sobrecarga e condições de trabalho
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 25-29
522 views DOI Abstract
2017
Magic size InP and InAs clusters: synthesis, characterization and shell growth.
Vol. 53 , No. 17 , pp. 2626-2629
515 views DOI Abstract
2017
medicamentos impróprios para o idoso disponibilizados pelo estado do rio de janeiro segundo os critérios de beers-fick inappropriate medications for the elderly provided by the rio de janeiro state, brazil according to the criteria of beers-fick
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 727-731
488 views DOI Abstract
2015
the production of knowledge about sexually transmitted diseases in young people: a bibliometric research
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 3037-3049
487 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chiral iridium(iii) complexes with four-membered Ir-S-P-S chelating rings for high-performance circularly polarized OLEDs.
486 views DOI Abstract
2018
Silicoaluminophosphate-11 (SAPO-11) molecular sieves synthesized via a grinding synthesis method.
Vol. 54 , No. 78 , pp. 10950-10953
485 views DOI Abstract
2020
medicines and its relation to the development of pressure injury in hospitalized-elderly people / medicamentos e sua relação com o desenvolvimento de lesão por pressão em idosos hospitalizados
Vol. 12 , pp. 222-226
478 views DOI Abstract
2019
A new supramolecular binder strongly enhancing the electrochemistry performance for lithium-sulfur batteries.
477 views DOI Abstract
2020
Highly crystalline NaBiTiO of a photocatalyst valence-band-controlled with Bi(III) for solar water splitting.
286 views DOI Abstract
2020
Creation of active water-splitting photocatalysts by controlling cocatalysts using atomically precise metal nanoclusters.
272 views DOI Abstract
2020
working with the enemy: alcoholic beverage in the work contexto / trabalhando com o inimigo: a bebida alcoólica no contexto laboral
Vol. 12 , pp. 934-938
179 views DOI Abstract
2020
medicines and its relation to the development of pressure injury in hospitalized-elderly people / medicamentos e sua relação com o desenvolvimento de lesão por pressão em idosos hospitalizados
Vol. 12 , pp. 222-226
478 views DOI Abstract
2020
Improved photocatalytic performance of covalent organic frameworks by nanostructure construction.
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
Large negative linear compressibility of a porous molecular co-crystal.
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
A carbon-based polymer dot sensor for breast cancer detection using peripheral blood immunocytes.
346 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nickel(ii)-methyl complexes adopting unusual seesaw geometries.
240 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interface passivation to overcome shunting in semiconductor-catalyst junctions.
318 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,185 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

71.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.