Indexed in Journament

reading and writing

ISSN 0922-4777· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,430 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 6.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name reading and writing
Abbreviated Name reading and writing
ISSN 0922-4777
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/11145

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 16.7 22.7
Innovation 22.5 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.2
Content Distribution 65.1 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2019
Content-area reading comprehension and teachers’ use of instructional time: effects on middle school students’ social studies knowledge
Toste, J.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1705-1722
433 views DOI
2019
Associations between language and literacy skills and sight word learning for native and nonnative English-speaking kindergarteners
Miles, K.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1681-1704
367 views DOI
2019
An emergent interaction between reading fluency and vocabulary in the prediction of reading comprehension among French immersion elementary students
Lee, K.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1657-1679
353 views DOI
2019
Multiple dimensions of adolescents’ reading attitudes and their relationship with reading comprehension
Jang, B.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1769-1793
346 views DOI
2011
不同等號概念之基模導向解題教學實驗研究 a schema-based problem-solving instruction experiment of different concepts of the equal sign on first graders
;陳嘉皇 Chia-Huang Chen
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 37-73
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
書評book review: reign of error: the hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to the america’s public schools (vintage, 2014)
;黃庭康 Ting-Kang Huang
Vol. 65 , No. 1 , pp. 103-110
326 views DOI Abstract
2018
美國華盛頓州國小階段跨國移民學生之學習安置和語言支援制度 a study of the academic placement and language support policy for immigrant students in an elementary public school of washington state, u.s.a.
;洪麗卿 Li-Ching Hung;劉美慧 Meihui Liu
Vol. 64 , No. 2 , pp. 85-123
290 views DOI Abstract
2015
想像力知多少？想像力四元模式的建構與量表發展 inquiry into imagination: constructing the reliabity and validity of imagination scales
;王秀槐 Hsiou-Huai Wang;黃金俊 Chin-Chun Huang
Vol. 61 , No. 4 , pp. 63-104
267 views DOI Abstract
2020
Written verb use and diversity in children with Developmental Language Disorder: stepping stones to academic writing
Stuart, N.
Vol. 33 , pp. 67-96
265 views DOI
2019
The relationship between reading and listening comprehension: shared and modality-specific components
Wolf, M.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1747-1767
263 views DOI
2020
書評book review: reign of error: the hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to the america’s public schools (vintage, 2014)
;黃庭康 Ting-Kang Huang
Vol. 65 , No. 1 , pp. 103-110
326 views DOI Abstract
2020
Adolescents’ use of academic language in informational writing
Fang, Z.
Vol. 33 , pp. 97-119
28 views DOI
2020
The role of cross-disciplinary academic language skills in disciplinary, source-based writing: investigating the role of core academic language skills in science summarization for middle grade writers
Phillips, Galloway E.
Vol. 33 , pp. 13-44
167 views DOI
2020
Written verb use and diversity in children with Developmental Language Disorder: stepping stones to academic writing
Stuart, N.
Vol. 33 , pp. 67-96
265 views DOI
2020
Writing across the academic languages: introduction
Silliman, E.
Vol. 33 , pp. 0-0
117 views DOI
2019
Development of vocabulary sophistication across genres in English children’s writing
Durrant, P.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1927-1953
181 views DOI
2019
The roles of writing knowledge, motivation, strategic behaviors, and skills in predicting elementary students’ persuasive writing from source material
Wijekumar, K.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1431-1457
229 views DOI
2019
Phonological awareness and reading in Thai children
Vibulpatanavong, K.
Vol. 32 , pp. 467-491
137 views DOI
2019
Dynamic assessment of phonological awareness in young foreign language learners: predictability and modifiability
Lu, Y.
Vol. 32 , pp. 891-908
193 views DOI
2019
The phonological awareness relation to early reading in English for three groups of simultaneous bilingual children
O’Brien, B.
Vol. 32 , pp. 909-937
186 views DOI
Journament Score
24.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,430 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

24.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

16.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

22.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.