Indexed in Journament

preventing school failure

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.9/100
Journament Score
#11,943
Journament Rank
19
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name preventing school failure
Abbreviated Name preventing school failure

Indexings

scopus

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

neuropsychological benefits of a narrative cognitive training program for people living with dementia: a pilot study
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 127-133
485 views DOI Abstract
a prospective study on the use of rivastigmine transdermal patch in alzheimer's dementia in a routine clinical setting
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 245-249
397 views DOI Abstract
which factors are associated with global cognitive impairment in wilson's disease?
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 320-326
341 views DOI Abstract
reversible dementia due to neurocysticercosis: improvement of the racemose type with antihistamines
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 85-90
290 views DOI Abstract
multiple hallucinations due to brainstem injury: a case report
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 353-355
290 views DOI Abstract
visuospatial processing: a review from basic to current concepts
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 175-181
276 views DOI Abstract
dementia post-radiotherapy: improvement with acetylcholinesterase inhibitor a case report
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 68-72
250 views DOI Abstract
reversible dementia due to neurocysticercosis: improvement of the racemose type with antihistamines
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 85-90
290 views DOI Abstract
cultural differences are reflected in variables associated with carer burden in ftd: a comparison study between india and australia
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 104-109
228 views DOI Abstract
neuropsychological benefits of a narrative cognitive training program for people living with dementia: a pilot study
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 127-133
485 views DOI Abstract
functional communication ability in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and alzheimer's disease
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 31-36
208 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
28
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

28.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.