Indexed in Journament

nurse researcher

ISSN 1351-5578· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,755 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 25.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Abbreviated Name nurse res
ISSN 1351-5578
URL http://journals.rcni.com/journal/nr

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 15.0 4.2
Content Distribution 60.9 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2019
Developing sustainable nursing and allied health professional research capacity.
Twelvetree, Timothy;Suckley, Janet;Booth, Nicola;Thomas, Debbie;Stanford, Penelope;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 48-54
542 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exchanging focus groups for individual interviews when collecting qualitative data.
Baillie, Lesley;
538 views DOI Abstract
2010
effect of physical activity on body water in sedentary young underweight and obese women
;Habibzadeh Nasim
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 84-87
525 views Abstract
2019
Using the literary folkloristic method to understand why people refuse medical interventions.
Molloy, Doreen;Hendricks, Joyce;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 40-47
479 views DOI Abstract
2017
pelvic organ prolapse managed at usmanu danfodiyo university teaching hospital, sokoto: a 10-year review
;Ahmed Yakubu;Abubakar Abubakar Panti;Ashiru Argungu Ladan;Ahmed Tanko Burodo;Mairo A Hassan;Sadiya Nasir
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 26-29
477 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical considerations when conducting research with children and young people with disabilities in health and social care.
McNeilly, Patricia;Macdonald, Geraldine;Kelly, Berni;
448 views DOI Abstract
2017
Reflecting on the learning opportunities of presenting at a conference.
Joshua, Beverly;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 27-30
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Methodological considerations when using ethnography to explore home care.
Baillie, Jessica;
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
An introduction to the origins, history and principles of ethnography.
Sinead Ryan, Gemma;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 15-21
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using local communities to establish geographical boundaries for case studies.
Bosley, Helen;Appleton, Jane;Henshall, Catherine;Jackson, Debra;
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical considerations when conducting research with children and young people with disabilities in health and social care.
McNeilly, Patricia;Macdonald, Geraldine;Kelly, Berni;
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erratum: A focused mapping review and synthesis of current practice in qualitative end of life research with the bereaved (Nurse researcher (2019))
Joanne, McCallum K.
Vol. 27 , pp. 14-19
259 views DOI
2019
Exchanging focus groups for individual interviews when collecting qualitative data.
Baillie, Lesley;
538 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using the literary folkloristic method to understand why people refuse medical interventions.
Molloy, Doreen;Hendricks, Joyce;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 40-47
479 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing sustainable nursing and allied health professional research capacity.
Twelvetree, Timothy;Suckley, Janet;Booth, Nicola;Thomas, Debbie;Stanford, Penelope;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 48-54
542 views DOI Abstract
2019
Philosophy and quality? TAPUPASM as an approach to rigour in critical realist research.
Ryan, Gemma;Rutty, Jane;
Vol. 27 , pp. 33-40
120 views DOI Abstract
2019
Postpositivist critical realism: philosophy, methodology and method for nursing research.
Ryan, Gemma Sinead;
259 views DOI Abstract
2019
Methodological considerations when using ethnography to explore home care.
Baillie, Jessica;
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using local communities to establish geographical boundaries for case studies.
Bosley, Helen;Appleton, Jane;Henshall, Catherine;Jackson, Debra;
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
A four-stage framework for conducting feminist storytelling research.
Klages, Debra;East, Leah;Jackson, Debra;Usher, Kim;
Vol. 27 , pp. 8-11
218 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,755 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

15.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.