Using the literary folkloristic method to understand why people refuse medical interventions.

Clicks: 474
ID: 46326
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #4 of 26 articles by views in nurse researcher

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Biomedicine is the dominant model in Western medicine. This regards disease as an identifiable reality located in people's bodies and best managed through medical interventions. Biomedicine has limited recognition of the effects of societal and cultural forces on health behaviours, so those who reject medical advice are problematic. This highlights the need for a method that considers the wider range of experiences that influence health behaviours.To describe the use of the literary folkloristic method to understand why people refuse medical interventions that reduce the risk of disease.This paper describes an innovative approach that was useful in understanding why people refuse conventional medical interventions. The literary folkloristic method provided a contextualised narrative of the experiences of high-risk women who refused risk-reducing surgery. Their stories revealed how their understandings of the risks from cancer contrasted starkly with the dominant medical discourse, ultimately leading them to reject interventions that could potentially save their lives.The literary folkloristic method gave voice to those who might otherwise have been silenced by the healthcare system.Nurses and nurse researchers can influence policy and practice by offering alternative understandings of poorly understood phenomena, such as patients refusing medical interventions. It is important healthcare providers approach this from the viewpoints of those directly involved, since strategies to support patients may be ineffective without such understanding.
Reference Key
molloy2019usingnurse Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Molloy, Doreen;Hendricks, Joyce;
Journal nurse researcher
Year 2019
DOI
10.7748/nr.2019.e1634
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.