Indexed in Journament

british journal of sports medicine

ISSN 1473-0480· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.0/100
Journament Score
#12,099
Journament Rank
20
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name br j sports med
Abbreviated Name br j sports med
ISSN 1473-0480
URL http://bjsm.bmj.com

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2020
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour
10,557 views DOI
2019
Mental health in elite athletes: International Olympic Committee consensus statement (2019)
1,094 views DOI
2020
Patient-centred care: the cornerstone for high-value musculoskeletal pain management
, pp. 1-
380 views DOI
2020
International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport 2020 (including STROBE Extension for Sport Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS)).
364 views DOI Abstract
2015
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for predicting sports performance and talent identification: Consensus statement.
Vol. 49 , No. 23 , pp. 1486-91
331 views DOI Abstract
2006
Use of 2 agonists in sport: are the present criteria right? * Commentary
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 363-366
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
Methods matter and the ‘too much, too soon’ theory (part 2): what is the goal of your sports injury research? Are you describing, predicting or drawing a causal inference?
, pp. 1-
309 views DOI
2020
Long overdue remarriage for better physical activity advice for all: bringing together the public health and occupational health agendas.
, pp. 1-
303 views DOI
2020
Fifteen-week window for recurrent muscle strains in football: a prospective cohort of 3600 muscle strains over 23 years in professional Australian rules football.
297 views DOI Abstract
2020
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour
10,557 views DOI
2020
Patient-centred care: the cornerstone for high-value musculoskeletal pain management
, pp. 1-
380 views DOI
2020
Long overdue remarriage for better physical activity advice for all: bringing together the public health and occupational health agendas.
, pp. 1-
303 views DOI
2020
Methods matter and the ‘too much, too soon’ theory (part 2): what is the goal of your sports injury research? Are you describing, predicting or drawing a causal inference?
, pp. 1-
309 views DOI
2020
International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport 2020 (including STROBE Extension for Sport Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS)).
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fifteen-week window for recurrent muscle strains in football: a prospective cohort of 3600 muscle strains over 23 years in professional Australian rules football.
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mental health in elite athletes: International Olympic Committee consensus statement (2019)
1,094 views DOI
2019
Correction: .
Vol. 53 , No. 18 , pp. e6
126 views DOI
2019
Association of high amounts of physical activity with mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
216 views DOI Abstract
36
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
75
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.