Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for predicting sports performance and talent identification: Consensus statement.

Clicks: 378
ID: 81622
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 20 articles by views in british journal of sports medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The general consensus among sport and exercise genetics researchers is that genetic tests have no role to play in talent identification or the individualised prescription of training to maximise performance. Despite the lack of evidence, recent years have witnessed the rise of an emerging market of direct-to-consumer marketing (DTC) tests that claim to be able to identify children's athletic talents. Targeted consumers include mainly coaches and parents. There is concern among the scientific community that the current level of knowledge is being misrepresented for commercial purposes. There remains a lack of universally accepted guidelines and legislation for DTC testing in relation to all forms of genetic testing and not just for talent identification. There is concern over the lack of clarity of information over which specific genes or variants are being tested and the almost universal lack of appropriate genetic counselling for the interpretation of the genetic data to consumers. Furthermore independent studies have identified issues relating to quality control by DTC laboratories with different results being reported from samples from the same individual. Consequently, in the current state of knowledge, no child or young athlete should be exposed to DTC genetic testing to define or alter training or for talent identification aimed at selecting gifted children or adolescents. Large scale collaborative projects, may help to develop a stronger scientific foundation on these issues in the future.
Reference Key
webborn2015directtoconsumerbritish Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Webborn, Nick;Williams, Alun;McNamee, Mike;Bouchard, Claude;Pitsiladis, Yannis;Ahmetov, Ildus;Ashley, Euan;Byrne, Nuala;Camporesi, Silvia;Collins, Malcolm;Dijkstra, Paul;Eynon, Nir;Fuku, Noriyuki;Garton, Fleur C;Hoppe, Nils;Holm, Søren;Kaye, Jane;Klissouras, Vassilis;Lucia, Alejandro;Maase, Kamiel;Moran, Colin;North, Kathryn N;Pigozzi, Fabio;Wang, Guan;
Journal british journal of sports medicine
Year 2015
DOI
10.1136/bjsports-2015-095343
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.