Association of high amounts of physical activity with mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clicks: 232
ID: 14174
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
74.6
/100
232 views
172 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #15 of 20 articles by views in british journal of sports medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To systematically review and analyse studies of high amounts of physical activity and mortality risk in the general population.Inclusion criteria related to follow-up (minimum 2 years), outcome (mortality from all causes, cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD) or coronary heart disease), exposure (eg, a category of >1000 metabolic equivalent of task (MET) min/week), study design (prospective cohort, nested case control or case-cohort) and reports of cases and person years of exposure categories.Systematic searches were conducted in Embase and Pubmed from database inception to 2 March 2019.The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.From 31 368 studies identified, 48 were included. Two authors independently extracted outcome estimates and assessed study quality.We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using random effect restricted cubic spline dose-response meta-analyses. Compared with the recommended level of physical activity (750 MET min/week), mortality risk was lower at physical activity levels exceeding the recommendations, at least until 5000 MET min/week for all cause mortality (HR=0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94) and for CVD mortality (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.95).The strengths of this study include the detailed dose-response analyses, inclusion of 48 studies and examination of sources of heterogeneity. The limitations include the observational nature of the included studies and the inaccurate estimations of amount of physical activity.Compared with the recommended level, mortality risk was lower at physical activity levels well above the recommended target range. Further, there was no threshold beyond which lifespan was compromised.PROSPERO CRD42017055727.
| Reference Key |
blond2019associationbritish
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Blond, Kim;Brinkløv, Cecilie Fau;Ried-Larsen, Mathias;Crippa, Alessio;Grøntved, Anders; |
| Journal | british journal of sports medicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
bjsports-2018-100393
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.