Indexed in Journament

EP Europace

Oxford University Press· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,257 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
88 Articles
Scores higher than 68.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name EP Europace
Abbreviated Name EP Europace

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 100.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 21.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for EP Europace
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 100.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 21.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (88)

2021
2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
200 views DOI Abstract
2016
2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS
23 views DOI Abstract
2015
Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
23 views DOI Abstract
2015
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death
23 views DOI Abstract
2013
2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)
21 views DOI Abstract
2021
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy
18 views DOI Abstract
2017
2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
18 views DOI
2026
Hemolysis and Renal Effects Across Pulsed Field Ablation Systems in Atrial Fibrillation
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
Characteristics of paced waveforms and current of injury prior to septal perforation during left bundle branch area pacing
16 views DOI Abstract
2013
European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Long-term incidence of infective endocarditis according to the type of cardiac implantable electronic device: a nationwide comparison with moderate- and high-risk patient groups
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Elimination of Epicardial Late Potentials by Endocardial Ablation in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
2 views DOI
2026
Non-linear associations between blood pressure and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Algorithm-guided personalized pulsed field ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective multicenter study with matched external comparison
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Cognitive Function and Telemedicine-based, Village Doctor-led Care for Atrial Fibrillation
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Practical Guide on the Use of the PulseSelect Pulsed Field Ablation System for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Outcomes of Amulet Occluder Implantation Following Watchman Screen Failure in the ADVANCE LAA Study: A Real-World Analysis of Procedural Success and Safety
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
AI-ICE Guided Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation with Variable Loop Circular Catheter
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Pulsed Field Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Variable Loop Circular Catheter: Outcomes from Large US Registry
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Irrigation-Dependent Acute Ganglionated Plexus Modulation During Variable-Loop Pulsed Field Ablation
4 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,257 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

21.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.