Indexed in Journament

The Review of Economic Studies

Oxford University Press· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,541 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
203 Articles
Scores higher than 67.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name The Review of Economic Studies
Abbreviated Name The Review of Economic Studies

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 90.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 13.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility — 22.6
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.0
Innovation — 24.1
Community Impact 2.9 4.1
Content Distribution 13.3 88.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (203)

2003
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation
Roland Bénabou, Jean Tirole
191 views DOI Abstract
2020
U.S. Monetary Policy and the Global Financial Cycle
Silvia Miranda‐Agrippino, Hélène Rey
166 views DOI Abstract
2024
Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation
Kirill Borusyak, Xavier Jaravel, Jann Spiess
112 views DOI Abstract
2014
Cross-Border Banking and Global Liquidity
Valentina Bruno, Hyun Song Shin
104 views DOI Abstract
1999
Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms
Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith, John Van Reenen
98 views DOI Abstract
2021
Quasi-Experimental Shift-Share Research Designs
Kirill Borusyak, Peter Hull, Xavier Jaravel
83 views DOI Abstract
2014
Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA
Lorenzo Caliendo, Fernando Parro
83 views DOI Abstract
2004
From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development
Oded Galor, Omer Moav
73 views DOI Abstract
1997
Risk, Financial Markets, and Human Capital in a Developing Country
Hanan G. Jacoby, Emmanuel Skoufias
62 views DOI Abstract
2026
Customer Acquisition, Business Dynamism and Aggregate Growth
Marek Ignaszak, Petr Sedláček
45 views DOI Abstract
2026
Measuring Markets for Network Goods
Leonardo Bursztyn, Matthew Gentzkow, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Aaron Leonard, Filip Milojević, Christopher Roth
DOI Abstract
2026
Entry and Profits in an Aging Economy: The Role of Consumer Inertia
Gideon Bornstein
DOI Abstract
2026
The End of Oil
Ryan Kellogg
DOI Abstract
2026
Demographics, Wealth, and Global Imbalances in the Twenty-First Century
Adrien Auclert, Hannes Malmberg, Frederic Martenet, Matthew Rognlie
DOI Abstract
2026
Machine Learning for Dynamic Incentive Problems
Philipp Renner, Simon Scheidegger
DOI Abstract
2026
Stockups, Stockouts, and the Role for Strategic Reserves
Brett Green, Cyrus Mevorach, Curtis R. Taylor
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Equity Frictions and Firm Ownership
Alessandra Peter
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Public Employee Pensions and Municipal Insolvency
Sean Myers
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Why Veil? Religious Headscarves and the Economic Role of Women
Naila Shofia
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Paying to Match: Decentralized Markets with Information Frictions
Marina Agranov, Ahrash Dianat, Larry Samuelson, Leeat Yariv
25 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,541 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

13.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.