analele universităţii constantin brâncuşi din târgu jiu : seria economie | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3458 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

analele universităţii constantin brâncuşi din târgu jiu : seria economie

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name analele universităţii constantin brâncuşi din târgu jiu : seria economie
Abbreviated Name analele universităţii constantin brâncuşi din târgu jiu : seria economie
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2015
THE ROLE OF THE ICT SECTOR IN ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
MARIA, TEODORESCU ANA;
Vol. 1 , No. Special number - Information society and sustainable development , pp. 144-148
461 views Abstract
2019
STUDY ON ROMANIAN CONSUMERS AND THE PERCEPTION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
CLAUDIA, MUNGIU-PUPĂZAN MARIANA;
, No. 3 , pp. 128-135
420 views Abstract
2015
changes in the concentrations of corticoid metabolites – the effect of stress, diet and analytical method
;Michaela Dušková;Lucie Sosvorová;Jana Vítků;Hana Jandíková;Beáta Rácz;Tereza Chlupáčová;Jose De Cordeiro;Luboslav Stárka
Vol. 116 , No. 4 , pp. 268-278
348 views DOI Abstract
2015
ACCOUNTING OF THE SETTLEMENTS WITH STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
GHEORGHE, HOLT;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 226 -230
330 views Abstract
2013
OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS IN THE PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS NUTRITIONAL USES
Delia, Nica-Badea;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 266-277
322 views Abstract
2018
INFLUENCE OF COSMETIC PACKAGING' COLOR ON PRICE PERCEPTION AND CONSUMER PREFERENCES
ARABI, AMEL;
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 92-100
313 views Abstract
2013
THE IMPLICATIONS OF MARKETING ACTIVITY IN RISK ANALYSIS, CORE ELEMENT OF LENDING POLICY TO COMMERCIAL BANKS
Florin-Mihai, Magda;
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 186-196
300 views Abstract
2017
quantitative parameters of interdental gingiva in chronic periodontitis patients with ifn-γ gene polymorphism
;Nadia Sheibak;Zahra Heidari;Hamidreza Mahmoudzadeh-Sagheb
Vol. 118 , No. 1 , pp. 37-48
293 views DOI Abstract
2019
A STUDY REGARDING CONSUMER SATISFACTION OF MIMI HOTEL
LOREDANA, DINU;GABRIEL, DINU;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 143-148
278 views Abstract
2013
PROTECTIVE GUARANTEES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS TO STRENGTHEN DEVELOPMENT OF THE BANK-CUSTOMER CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP
LUCIAN-ION, MEDAR;CHIRTOC, IRINA- ELENA;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 60-65
265 views Abstract
View All 29 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.