OPINIONS ON INTERNATIONAL RESERVES MANAGEMENT - POST CRISIS
Clicks: 213
ID: 26853
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
75.1
/100
213 views
165 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #21 of 29 articles by views in analele universităţii constantin brâncuşi din târgu jiu : seria economie
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The recent crisis demonstrated once again the importance of maintaining an adequate level of the international
reserves as part of the defense of a country against the shocks internationally transmitted. Liquidity buffers aided the
good functioning of financial systems, and allowed countries to cope with sudden foreign capital stops or to manage
massive outflows without facing a costly crisis. This logic has been strengthened in the context of the crisis from 2008,
when countries with lots of reserves, such as China or Brazil, came through better than those with lower liquid assets.
Economists have argued that developing countries need reserves mainly to cover urgent imports and short-term debts.
The current level of global reserves far exceeds this traditional postulate.
In this context, it is necessary to rethink the adequacy of the level of constituting the reserves portfolio.
The dominance of the dollar as a reserve currency, another important feature of the current reserves portfolio, makes
the holders become vulnerable to the monetary policy of FED.
A greater flexibility of the currency will also be needed. The often called the “trilemma” of international economics
dictates: when capital is mobile, countries must choose between fixing their currencies and controlling their domestic
monetary conditions. They cannot do both. The domestic currency inflexibility will ultimately lead to asset bubbles and
inflation. The pressure of capital flows will depend on the prospects of rich economies, especially America’s. The
increment of emerging economies availability to allow the exchange rate to move will depend on what China does -
and China may remain forever linked to the dollar.
The emergence of a global currency that constitute a genuine means of exchange or the use of cross-border multifaceted
cash pools common to IMF members would reduce systemic risks.
International regulations for countries with persistent trade surpluses could be a solution to narrow the disparities
between developed and developing countries
| Reference Key |
amalia2017opinionsanalele
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | AMALIA, MERCEA (HANDRO) PATRICIA; |
| Journal | analele universităţii constantin brâncuşi din târgu jiu : seria economie |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.