Indexed in Journament

Cancer research

ISSN 1538-7445· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,387 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 16.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Cancer Res
Abbreviated Name cancer research
ISSN 1538-7445
URL http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Cancer research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 38.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2017
Amlexanox Downregulates S100A6 to Sensitize KMT2A/AFF1-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia to TNFα Treatment
Vol. 77 , No. 16 , pp. -
482 views Abstract
2004
Analysis of Wnt gene expression in prostate cancer: mutual inhibition by WNT11 and the androgen receptor
Vol. 64 , No. 21 , pp. -
410 views Abstract
2019
Topological Tumor Graphs: a graph-based spatial model to infer stromal recruitment for immunosuppression in melanoma histology.
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
Noninvasive Quantification of 2-Hydroxyglutarate in Human Gliomas with IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations.
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 43-9
400 views DOI Abstract
2001
A human prostatic epithelial model of hormonal carcinogenesis
Vol. 61 , No. 16 , pp. -
394 views Abstract
2010
FZD4 as a mediator of ERG oncogene-induced WNT signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human prostate cancer cells
Vol. 70 , No. 17 , pp. -
374 views Abstract
1983
Isolation and characterization of endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus from hepatocyte nodules in male wistar rats
Vol. 43 , No. 7 , pp. -
364 views Abstract
2019
Asporin Restricts Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Differentiation, Alters the Tumor Microenvironment, and Drives Metastatic Progression.
Vol. 79 , No. 14 , pp. 3636-3650
359 views DOI Abstract
2024
2024
Abstract IA-01: Targeting autophagy in pancreatic cancer
21 views DOI Abstract
2024
NAT10 Phase Separation Regulates YTHDF1 Splicing to Promote Gastric Cancer Progression.
142 views DOI Abstract
2023
Abstract 4353: Utilizing scRNA sequencing to understand biomarkers of response and resistance to Sacitizumab Govetican in localized TNBC
Vol. 83 , No. 7 , pp. 4353-4353
85 views DOI
2020
Abstract IA-12: Precision oncology for pancreatic cancer
21 views DOI Abstract
2020
Abstract IA-16: Metabolic adaptations in pancreatic cancer
19 views DOI Abstract
2020
Abstract 4353: The Fibrolamellar Registry: A patient-based medical registry can address medical care
Vol. 80 , No. 1 , pp. 4353-4353
59 views DOI
2019
Abstract 4353: Stroma drive metabolic reprogramming and induces stemness properties in pancreatic cancer cells
Vol. 79 , No. 1 , pp. 4353-4353
79 views DOI
Journament Score
28.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,387 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

38.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.