journal of the indian society of remote sensing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8536 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of the indian society of remote sensing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of the indian society of remote sensing
Abbreviated Name journal of the indian society of remote sensing
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2018
Utilizing Geo-information Tools for Mapping Spatio-temporal Changes in Population of Prosopis cineraria (khejri) in Agroforestry System of Arid Western Rajasthan
Moharana, P.
Vol. 46 , pp. 431-442
334 views DOI
2018
Mapping the Extent of Agroforestry Area in Different Altitudes of Tehri District, North Western Himalaya, India Through GIS and Remote Sensing Data
Vikrant, K.
Vol. 46 , pp. 1471-1480
321 views DOI
2011
understanding representations of the roles of teachers and students of english as a foreign language in different contexts in the light of transitivity analysis
;Solange Teresinha Ricardo de Castro
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. -
268 views Abstract
2011
classroom observations and the power relations between academic coordinators and teachers in feedback sessions
;Francisco Carlos Fogaça
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. -
261 views Abstract
2011
writing skills in first and foreign languages in undergraduate engineering courses: reporting experiences
;Silvia Matravolgyi Damião
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. -
256 views Abstract
2011
the effect of learning strategies instruction on the oral production development of english undergraduate students from the federal university of pará: a case study
;Kelly C. M. Gaignoux;Walkyria Magno e Silva
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. -
253 views Abstract
2018
Spatial Prediction of Rainfall-Induced Landslides Using Aggregating One-Dependence Estimators Classifier
Binh Thai Pham;Indra Prakash;Abolfazl Jaafari;Dieu Tien Bui;Binh Thai Pham;Indra Prakash;Abolfazl Jaafari;Dieu Tien Bui;
Vol. 46 , No. 9 , pp. 1457-1470
244 views DOI Abstract
2011
media subjects on body image in the teenagers´s point of view: a teaching proposal of critical reading (esp)
;Aline Provedel Dib;Gisele C. Cohen Fonseca
Vol. 29 , pp. -
238 views Abstract
2011
modalization as persuasion in the discourse of ma dissertation introductions
;Elaine Cristine Fernandes da Silva
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. -
235 views Abstract
2011
systemic functional grammar in the teaching of reading philosophical texts in eap
;Orlando Vian Jr.
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. -
212 views Abstract
View All 26 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.