the journal of physiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#309 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 hours ago

the journal of physiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j physiol (lond)
Abbreviated Name j physiol (lond)
ISSN 1469-7793
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (68 total)

1998
functional outcome in sarcomas treated with limb-salvage surgery or amputation
;Rikke Johansen;Ole S. Nielsen;Johnny Keller
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 19-23
312 views DOI Abstract
2016
hERG quality control and the long QT syndrome.
Foo, Brian;Williamson, Brittany;Young, Jason C;Lukacs, Gergely;Shrier, Alvin;
Vol. 594 , No. 9 , pp. 2469-81
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Agency and responsibility over virtual movements controlled through different paradigms of brain-computer interface.
Nierula, Birgit;Spanlang, Bernhard;Martini, Matteo;Borrell, Mireia;Nikulin, Vadim V;Sanchez-Vives, Maria V;
306 views DOI Abstract
2006
Resistance exercise increases AMPK activity and reduces 4E-BP1 phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle
Dreyer HC;Fujita S;Cadenas JG;Chinkes DL;Volpi E;Rasmussen BB;;
Vol. 576 , No. Pt 2 , pp. -
306 views Abstract
1998
Intercellular Ca2+ waves in rat heart muscle
Christine Lamont,Paul W. Luther,C. William Balke,W. Gil Wier;Christine Lamont;Paul W. Luther;C. William Balke;W. Gil Wier;
Vol. 512 , No. 3 , pp. 669-676
267 views DOI Abstract
2013
Intravital Förster resonance energy transfer imaging reveals elevated [Ca2+]i and enhanced sympathetic tone in femoral arteries of angiotensin II-infused hypertensive biosensor mice
Youhua Wang,Ling Chen,W. Gil Wier,Jin Zhang;Youhua Wang;Ling Chen;W. Gil Wier;Jin Zhang;
Vol. 591 , No. 21 , pp. 5321-5336
266 views DOI Abstract
2015
the use of radiation therapy in well-differentiated soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: an ncdb review
;Alexander L. Lazarides;William C. Eward;Paul J. Speicher;Chun-Han Hou;Daniel P. Nussbaum;Cindy Green;Dan G. Blazer;David G. Kirsch;Brian E. Brigman
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
260 views DOI Abstract
2008
A technique for simultaneous measurement of Ca2+, FRET fluorescence and force in intact mouse small arteries
W. Gil Wier,M. A. Rizzo,Hema Raina,Joseph Zacharia;W. Gil Wier;M. A. Rizzo;Hema Raina;Joseph Zacharia;
Vol. 586 , No. 10 , pp. 2437-2443
256 views DOI Abstract
1998
Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release: physiological experiments on a new level
W. Gil Wier;W. Gil Wier;
Vol. 508 , No. 3 , pp. 645-
250 views DOI
2003
Purinergic and Adrenergic Ca2+Transients during Neurogenic Contractions of Rat Mesenteric Small Arteries
Christine Lamont,Enrikas Vainorius,W. Gil Wier;Christine Lamont;Enrikas Vainorius;W. Gil Wier;
Vol. 549 , No. 3 , pp. 801-808
249 views DOI Abstract
View All 68 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.