Indexed in Journament

the journal of physiology

ISSN 1469-7793· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,628 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
68 Articles
Scores higher than 60.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j physiol (lond)
Abbreviated Name j physiol (lond)
ISSN 1469-7793
URL https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14697793

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the journal of physiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 42.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 64.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (68)

2006
Resistance exercise increases AMPK activity and reduces 4E-BP1 phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle
Vol. 576 , No. Pt 2 , pp. -
414 views Abstract
2019
Agency and responsibility over virtual movements controlled through different paradigms of brain-computer interface.
412 views DOI Abstract
2016
hERG quality control and the long QT syndrome.
Vol. 594 , No. 9 , pp. 2469-81
387 views DOI Abstract
2013
Intravital Förster resonance energy transfer imaging reveals elevated [Ca2+]i and enhanced sympathetic tone in femoral arteries of angiotensin II-infused hypertensive biosensor mice
Vol. 591 , No. 21 , pp. 5321-5336
376 views DOI Abstract
1998
functional outcome in sarcomas treated with limb-salvage surgery or amputation
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 19-23
365 views DOI Abstract
2003
Purinergic and Adrenergic Ca2+Transients during Neurogenic Contractions of Rat Mesenteric Small Arteries
Vol. 549 , No. 3 , pp. 801-808
363 views DOI Abstract
2008
A technique for simultaneous measurement of Ca2+, FRET fluorescence and force in intact mouse small arteries
Vol. 586 , No. 10 , pp. 2437-2443
359 views DOI Abstract
1998
Intercellular Ca2+ waves in rat heart muscle
Vol. 512 , No. 3 , pp. 669-676
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serotonin exerts a direct modulatory role on bladder afferent firing in mice.
348 views DOI Abstract
1998
Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release: physiological experiments on a new level
Vol. 508 , No. 3 , pp. 645-
341 views DOI
2019
Agency and responsibility over virtual movements controlled through different paradigms of brain-computer interface.
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serotonin exerts a direct modulatory role on bladder afferent firing in mice.
348 views DOI Abstract
2018
a longitudinal study of functional outcomes in patients with limb salvage surgery for soft tissue sarcoma
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
299 views DOI Abstract
2018
retrospective analysis of spectrum of presentation and treatment outcome in extremity sarcomas: a single-centre experience
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
231 views DOI Abstract
2017
high-dose ifosfamide chemotherapy in a series of patients affected by myxoid liposarcoma
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
189 views DOI Abstract
2017
Gene expression analyses reveal metabolic specifications in acute O -sensing chemoreceptor cells.
Vol. 595 , No. 18 , pp. 6091-6120
309 views DOI Abstract
2016
current immunotherapies for sarcoma: clinical trials and rationale
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
121 views DOI Abstract
2016
routes to diagnosis for suspected sarcoma: the impact of symptoms and clinical findings on the diagnostic process
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
120 views DOI Abstract
2016
hERG quality control and the long QT syndrome.
Vol. 594 , No. 9 , pp. 2469-81
387 views DOI Abstract
2015
the use of radiation therapy in well-differentiated soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: an ncdb review
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
338 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,628 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

42.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.