nippon kagaku zassi | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5181 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

nippon kagaku zassi

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name nippon kagaku zassi
Abbreviated Name nippon kagaku zassi
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2015
the effectiveness of social skills training program via peer tutoring on aggression level
;İsmail YELPAZE;Eyyüp ÖZKAMALI
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 499-511
269 views DOI Abstract
2018
doğu akdeniz ticaretinde rum korsanlar ve korsanlığın sonu (1789-1830)
;Haydar Çoruh
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 1133-1153
262 views DOI Abstract
2013
uploading the workload: e-materialization processes based on knowledge economy in higher education
;Erdem ÖNGÜN;Aşkin DEMIRAĞ
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 337-351
241 views Abstract
2016
labor force participation of syrian refugees and integration: case of adana and mersin cities
;İhsan Çetin
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 1001-1016
240 views DOI Abstract
2015
the importance of target market selection for more profitable olive oil exports by turkey: a case study
;Mustafa METE
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 371-386
233 views DOI Abstract
2018
the long-run relationship between economic growth and tourism revenue: the case of turkey and trnc- ekonomik büyüme ile turizm geliri arasındaki uzun dönemli İlişki: türkiye ve kktc Örneği
;Mehmet ÇINAR;Barış ÜLKER
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 592-602
211 views DOI Abstract
2017
trachoma in adıyaman and besni in the republican era (1925-1975)
;Hamdi Doğan
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 461-489
211 views DOI Abstract
2015
comparison of leylâ and mecnun stories written by fuzulî and reşat nuri güntekin
;Mehmet Korkut ÇEÇEN
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 207-216
206 views DOI Abstract
2017
an investigation of educational philosophies that teacher candidates adopt through critical thinking tendencies in terms of several variables
;Serkan ASLAN;Birsel AYBEK
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 373-385
186 views DOI Abstract
2017
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin benlik kurgularıyla toplumsal cinsiyet algıları arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi
;Alper ÇUHADAROĞLU;Osman Nejat AKFIRAT
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 1031-1046
180 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.