Indexed in Journament

journal of food process engineering

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
44.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #379 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
35 Articles
Scores higher than 98.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of food process engineering
Abbreviated Name journal of food process engineering

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 72.2
Innovation 66.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 63.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of food process engineering
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 72.2 28.8
Innovation 66.0 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 63.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2010
atención quirúrgica en hombres y mujeres ¿diferente o desigual?
, No. 5 , pp. 219-248
319 views DOI Abstract
2011
las mujeres, las guerras y el derecho internacional humanitario
, No. 6 , pp. 117-133
309 views DOI Abstract
2011
de nápoles a beijing, (1799-1995). dos siglos de mujeres y paz
, No. 6 , pp. 9-34
284 views DOI Abstract
2008
violencia contra la mujer en el plano jurídico internacional y colombiano
, No. 3 , pp. 125-152
280 views DOI Abstract
2011
vencedoras y vencidas: las educadoras leonesas ante la guerra civil española
, No. 6 , pp. 239-263
273 views DOI Abstract
2012
corporalidad femenina, autoestima y discurso de moda: un estudio cualitativo
, No. 7 , pp. 207-225
231 views DOI Abstract
2017
el gran milagro... todavía=the great miracle… as yet
, No. 12 , pp. 401-415
15 views DOI Abstract
2017
la sabiduría de nuestras comadres=the wisdom of our co-mothers
, No. 12 , pp. 01-08
157 views DOI Abstract
2016
impulso a la igualdad de oportunidades entre hombres y mujeres
, No. 11 , pp. 581-585
110 views DOI Abstract
2016
women and media. institutional cultures, inequality and dynamics of power: 1982 to 2002
, No. 11 , pp. 297-312
223 views DOI Abstract
2016
cine queer español dirigido por mujeres: inicios, evolución y situación actual
, No. 11 , pp. 477-486
90 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
44.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #379 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

44.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

66.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.