journal of food process engineering | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4698 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of food process engineering

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name journal of food process engineering
Abbreviated Name journal of food process engineering
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2019
Optimization of extruder cooking conditions for the manufacture of fish feeds using response surface methodology
Irungu F.
Vol. 42 , pp. 0-0
368 views DOI
2018
Effects of voltage gradient and fat content on changes of electrical conductivity of frozen minced beef meat during ohmic thawing
Cevik, M.
Vol. 41 , pp. 0-0
298 views DOI
2010
atención quirúrgica en hombres y mujeres ¿diferente o desigual?
;Charlene Beth Arnold Bechler;María Teresa Ruiz Cantero;Jordi Torrubiano Domínguez;Vicente Clemente Gómez;Teresa Blasco Segura
, No. 5 , pp. 219-248
264 views DOI Abstract
2008
violencia contra la mujer en el plano jurídico internacional y colombiano
;Alba Nidia Triana Martínez
, No. 3 , pp. 125-152
248 views DOI Abstract
2009
o dia internacional da mulher na perspectiva discursiva do presidente brasileiro, luiz inácio lula da silva
;Luciana Panke
, No. 4 , pp. 383-412
246 views DOI Abstract
2011
las mujeres, las guerras y el derecho internacional humanitario
;Marta Postigo Asenjo
, No. 6 , pp. 117-133
244 views DOI Abstract
2011
vencedoras y vencidas: las educadoras leonesas ante la guerra civil española
;Raquel Poy Castro
, No. 6 , pp. 239-263
241 views DOI Abstract
2011
de nápoles a beijing, (1799-1995). dos siglos de mujeres y paz
;Montserrat Huguet Santos
, No. 6 , pp. 9-34
226 views DOI Abstract
2009
¿políticas para mujeres?: la concepción del trabajo femenino en los partidos políticos durante la transición a la democracia. reflexiones desde el caso almeriense (almería, 1977-1983)
;Ángeles María Segura Fernández
, No. 4 , pp. 147-170
206 views DOI Abstract
2017
las periodistas desde los estudios del periodismo: perfiles profesionales de las mujeres en los medios informativos=female journalists from journalism studies: professional profiles of women in media
;Adriana Amado
, No. 12 , pp. 325-346
202 views DOI Abstract
View All 35 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.