Indexed in Journament

ultrasonics sonochemistry

ISSN 1873-2828· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #946 of 29,298 scored journals (34,018 indexed)
59 Articles
Scores higher than 96.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ultrason sonochem
Abbreviated Name ultrason sonochem
ISSN 1873-2828
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ultrasonics-sonochemistry

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for ultrasonics sonochemistry
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.4 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 63.6 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 5.7
Content Distribution 79.5 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (59)

2019
Response surface methodology for optimization of cinnamon essential oil nanoemulsion with improved stability and antifungal activity.
Vol. 60 , pp. 104604
498 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ultrasonic, hydrodynamic and microwave biodiesel synthesis - A comparative study for continuous process.
Vol. 57 , pp. 38-47
468 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sonochemical synthesis of PrMoO nanostructures as an effective photocatalyst for waste-water treatment.
Vol. 58 , pp. 104687
458 views DOI Abstract
2019
A study on the synchronous decoration of molybdenum oxide or tungsten oxide nanoparticles on anode materials for natural gas fed solid oxide fuel cells using ultrasounds.
Vol. 59 , pp. 104715
423 views DOI Abstract
2020
Application of persulfate with hydrodynamic cavitation and ferrous in the decomposition of pentachlorophenol.
Vol. 66 , pp. 105106
419 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ultrasound assisted wet media milling synthesis of nanofiber-cage LiFePO/C.
Vol. 68 , pp. 105177
337 views DOI Abstract
2020
Targeting and deep-penetrating delivery strategy for stented coronary artery by magnetic guidance and ultrasound stimulation.
Vol. 67 , pp. 105188
319 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ultrasound-assisted Li/Na co-intercalated exfoliation of graphite into few-layer graphene.
Vol. 66 , pp. 105108
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Application of persulfate with hydrodynamic cavitation and ferrous in the decomposition of pentachlorophenol.
Vol. 66 , pp. 105106
419 views DOI Abstract
2020
Application of (super)cavitation for the recycling of process waters in paper producing industry.
Vol. 64 , pp. 105002
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Influence of ultrasound-assisted sodium bicarbonate marination on the curing efficiency of chicken breast meat.
Vol. 60 , pp. 104808
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Preparation of allicin-whey protein isolate conjugates: Allicin extraction by water, conjugates' ultrasound-assisted binding and its stability, solubility and emulsibility analysis.
Vol. 63 , pp. 104981
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
Study on ultrasonic-electrochemical treatment for difficult-to-settle slime water.
Vol. 64 , pp. 104978
334 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #946 of 29,298 scored
(34,018 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

43.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

63.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.