Indexed in Journament

Food quality and preference

ISSN 0950-3293· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,912 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 4.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Food Qual Prefer
Abbreviated Name food quality and preference
ISSN 0950-3293
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405859/description#description

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 25.5 31.2
Community Impact 6.4 13.4
Content Distribution 57.0 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2019
Personality traits and consumer acceptance of controversial food technology: A cross-country investigation of genetically modified animal products
Lin W.
Vol. 76 , pp. 10-19
479 views DOI
2019
Psychological profiles of people who justify eating meat as natural, necessary, normal, or nice
Hopwood C.
Vol. 75 , pp. 10-14
354 views DOI
2020
Cross-national comparison of the Food Disgust Picture Scale between Switzerland and China using confirmatory factor analysis
Ammann, J.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI
2020
Can games change children's eating behaviour? A review of gamification and serious games
Chow, C.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
333 views DOI
2020
Food preferences and intake in a population of Dutch individuals with self-reported smell loss: An online survey
Postma, E.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2020
Consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward consuming functional foods in Norway
Nystrand, B.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
293 views DOI
2020
Decreasing consumers’ risk perception of food additives by knowledge enhancement in China
Miao, P.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
290 views DOI
2019
Explaining consumer purchase behavior for organic milk: Including trust and green self-identity within the theory of planned behavior
Carfora, V.
Vol. 76 , pp. 1-9
284 views DOI
2010
simulaciÓn dinÁmica del comportamiento proambiental en la reducciÓn de la contaminaciÓn atmosfÉrica en el valle de aburrÁ.
;LOPERA POSADA JUAN DAVID
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. -
284 views Abstract
2019
The impact of a gluten-free claim on the perceived healthfulness, calories, level of processing and expected taste of food products
Prada, M.
Vol. 73 , pp. 284-287
258 views DOI
2024
Effects of a short food education program implemented at school canteens on children's acceptance of plant-based food: A quasi-experimental study
Dahmani, J.
Vol. 115 , pp. 0-0
80 views DOI
2023
Taste of green: Consumer liking of pasture-raised beef hamburgers as affected by information on the production system
Ohlau, M.
Vol. 107 , pp. 0-0
64 views DOI
2022
Impact of consumer global-local identity on attitude towards and intention to buy local foods.
Zhang, Ting;Chen, Jing;Grunert, Klaus G;
Vol. 96 , pp. 104428
34 views DOI Abstract
2021
What factors affect consumers’ dining sentiments and their ratings: Evidence from restaurant online review data
Tian, G.
Vol. 88 , pp. 0-0
92 views DOI
2021
Determinants of fishery and aquaculture products consumption at home in the EU28
Cantillo, J.
Vol. 88 , pp. 0-0
150 views DOI
2020
Can games change children's eating behaviour? A review of gamification and serious games
Chow, C.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
333 views DOI
2020
Korean mothers’ food choice behavioral intent for children: An examination of the interaction effects of food type, household income, and healthism
Jeong, J.
Vol. 81 , pp. 0-0
194 views DOI
2020
Consumer associations about other buyers of suboptimal food – And what it means for food waste avoidance actions
Aschemann-Witzel, J.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
240 views DOI
2020
Consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward consuming functional foods in Norway
Nystrand, B.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
293 views DOI
2020
Individual differences in texture preferences among European children: Development and validation of the Child Food Texture Preference Questionnaire (CFTPQ)
Laureati, M.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
219 views DOI
Journament Score
24.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,912 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

24.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

25.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

57.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.