Food quality and preference | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7798 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 1 mois

Food quality and preference

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Nom Abrégé Food Qual Prefer
Nom Abrégé food quality and preference
ISSN 0950-3293
Objectifs et Portée
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405859/description#description
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

2019
Personality traits and consumer acceptance of controversial food technology: A cross-country investigation of genetically modified animal products
Lin W.
Vol. 76 , pp. 10-19
459 views DOI
2019
Psychological profiles of people who justify eating meat as natural, necessary, normal, or nice
Hopwood C.
Vol. 75 , pp. 10-14
327 views DOI
2020
Can games change children's eating behaviour? A review of gamification and serious games
Chow, C.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
321 views DOI
2020
Cross-national comparison of the Food Disgust Picture Scale between Switzerland and China using confirmatory factor analysis
Ammann, J.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
311 views DOI
2020
Food preferences and intake in a population of Dutch individuals with self-reported smell loss: An online survey
Postma, E.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
270 views DOI
2020
Consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward consuming functional foods in Norway
Nystrand, B.
Vol. 80 , pp. 0-0
269 views DOI
2020
Decreasing consumers’ risk perception of food additives by knowledge enhancement in China
Miao, P.
Vol. 79 , pp. 0-0
269 views DOI
2010
simulaciÓn dinÁmica del comportamiento proambiental en la reducciÓn de la contaminaciÓn atmosfÉrica en el valle de aburrÁ.
;LOPERA POSADA JUAN DAVID
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. -
263 views Abstract
2019
Explaining consumer purchase behavior for organic milk: Including trust and green self-identity within the theory of planned behavior
Carfora, V.
Vol. 76 , pp. 1-9
252 views DOI
2019
The impact of a gluten-free claim on the perceived healthfulness, calories, level of processing and expected taste of food products
Prada, M.
Vol. 73 , pp. 284-287
242 views DOI
View All 32 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.