weed science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#508 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

weed science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name weed science
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0043-1745
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weed-science
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

1993
Hysteretic characteristics of atrazine adsorption-desorption by a Sharkey soil
Ma, Liwang;Southwick, Lloyd M;Willis, Guye H;Selim, H Magdi
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 627-633
261 views
2019
Target-Site Resistance Mechanisms to Tribenuron-Methyl and Cross-Resistance Patterns to ALS-Inhibiting Herbicides of Catchweed Bedstraw (Galium aparine) with Different ALS Mutations
Deng, W.
Vol. 67 , pp. 183-188
240 views DOI
1994
Sorption and desorption of imazethapyr and 5-hydroxyimazethapyr in Minnesota soils
Gan, Jianying;Weimer, Monte R;Koskinen, William C;Buhler, Douglas D;Wyse, Donald L;Becker, Roger L
Vol. 42 , No. 1 , pp. 92-97
230 views
2012
osteocephalus castaneicola moravec, aparicio, guerrero-reinhard, calderón, jungfer & gvozdík, 2009 (anura: hylidae). extensión de su distribución geográfica y nuevo registro para el departamento de la paz, bolivia
;Aguilar-Kirigin, Alvaro Juan
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 107-109
214 views Abstract
1998
rectificaciones y comentarios nomenclaturales al capítulo sobre reptiles, excepto ofidios, de biodiversidad de la provincia de córdoba. fauna. volumen 1
;Cabrera, Mario R.
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 35-36
208 views Abstract
1985
estudios exprimentales en larvas de bufo fernandezae gallardo. crecimiento longitudinal y su relación con el alimento, concentración de oxígeno y densidad (amphibia: anura)
;Kehr, Arturo Ignacio
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 1-14
200 views Abstract
2006
estatus de liolaemus ditadai, cei 1983, (iguania: liolaemidae) y ampliación de su rango de distribución
;Abdala, Cristian Simón
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 59-63
163 views Abstract
2015
políticas científicas, optimalidad y sistemas complejos
;Ricardo Montero
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 151-154
161 views Abstract
1989
microanatomía e histogénesis del aparato bucal en las larvas de bufo arenarum (anura, bufonidae)
;Fiorito de López, Luisa E.;Echeverría, Dinorah Diana
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 4-10
154 views
2005
reproducción comparada de tres especies de anuros sintópicos de una localidad del sudeste de córdoba
;Martori, Ricardo;Aun, Liliana;Birri, Andrea;Rozzi Giménez, Cristina;Heredia, Evelina
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 43-59
153 views Abstract
View All 24 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.