Indexed in Journament

the journal of antibiotics

ISSN 0021-8820· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,346 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
20 Articles
Scores higher than 78.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j antibiot
Abbreviated Name j antibiot
ISSN 0021-8820
URL http://www.nature.com/ja

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the journal of antibiotics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 50.0 25.8
Innovation 60.0 27.4
Community Impact 13.6 7.8
Content Distribution 75.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2003
Oximidine III, a new antitumor antibiotic against transformed cells from Pseudomonas sp. I. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation, physico-chemical properties and biological activity.
Vol. 56 , No. 11 , pp. 899-904
492 views Abstract
2016
rome.the etymological origins
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 128-134
396 views Abstract
2003
Kigamicins, novel antitumor antibiotics. I. Taxonomy, isolation, physico-chemical properties and biological activities.
Vol. 56 , No. 12 , pp. 1004-11
392 views Abstract
2003
EI-2346, a novel interleukin-1beta converting enzyme inhibitor produced by Streptomyces sp. E-2346. I. Taxonomy of producing strain, fermentation, isolation, physico-chemical properties, and biological properties.
Vol. 56 , No. 12 , pp. 985-92
383 views Abstract
2003
Cyrmenins, new beta-methoxyacrylate inhibitors of the electron transport. Production, isolation, physico-chemical and biological properties.
Vol. 56 , No. 10 , pp. 827-31
379 views Abstract
2003
EI-1941-1 and -2, novel interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme inhibitors Produced by Farrowia sp. E-1941. II. Taxonomy of producing strain, fermentation, isolation, physico-chemical properties, and biological properties.
Vol. 56 , No. 7 , pp. 603-9
372 views Abstract
2017
psycholinguistics and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence
Vol. 19 , pp. 110-116
365 views Abstract
2016
rome.the etymological origins
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 128-134
396 views Abstract
2013
microbial diversity indices in burned soils estimated by biolog and plfa techniques
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 5-8
319 views Abstract
2013
universe in the theoretical model «evolving matter»
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 7-11
126 views Abstract
2013
do stones modify the spatial distribution of fire-induced soil water repellency? preliminary data
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 76-80
285 views Abstract
2013
2011
Концепция программы формирования нового человека
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 149-158
343 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,346 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

50.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

60.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.