mycokeys | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1757 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

mycokeys

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name mycokeys
Abbreviated Name mycokeys
ISSN 1314-4049
Aim and Scope
URL http://mycokeys.pensoft.net
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

2019
(Pyronemataceae) - a new species from South Africa and the first report of anamorph in bryophilous Pezizales.
Sochorová, Zuzana;Döbbeler, Peter;Sochor, Michal;van Rooy, Jacques;
Vol. 54 , pp. 49-76
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Placement of Triblidiaceae in Rhytismatales and comments on unique ascospore morphologies in Leotiomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota)
, Jason M. Karakehian;Quijada, Luis;Friebes, Gernot;Tanney, Joey B.;Pfister, Donald H.;
Vol. 54 , pp. 99-133
321 views Abstract
2015
management of the internal market innovation in the areas of production, works and services
;Afanas'eva Al'bina Nazipovna
, pp. -
308 views Abstract
2012
risk management innovations in uzbekistan banks
;Yuldashev Farhodbek Abdumutalibovich
, pp. -
260 views Abstract
2012
person: a resource or capacity development in the economy?
;Shagalov Igor Lvovich;Skopina Irina Vasilyevna
, pp. -
259 views Abstract
2013
concept analysis of competitiveness
;Bychkovskii Andrei Yurevich
, pp. -
250 views Abstract
2014
financial competence and macroeconomic forecasts of budget of the russian federation
;Gritsiuk Tat'iana Vladimirovna;Kotilko Valerii Valentinovich
, pp. -
248 views Abstract
2012
the index approach to the analysis of spatial distribution and dynamics of the input indicators of the russian innovation system
;Karpuhin Aleksandr Anatolyevich
, pp. -
245 views Abstract
2015
the risk management in bank lending technology corporations
;Kasimova Liana Irikovna
, pp. -
206 views Abstract
2015
the formation of advertising activity on the market of tourism services under the conditions global economy
;Kozhuhovskaja Raisa Borisovna
, pp. -
202 views Abstract
View All 34 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.