Indexed in Journament

scientific american

ISSN 0036-8733· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,281 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
69 Articles
Scores higher than 17.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name sci am
Abbreviated Name sci am
ISSN 0036-8733
URL https://www.scientificamerican.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for scientific american
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 0.0 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.2
Content Distribution 62.8 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (69)

2010
avaliação prospectiva dos pacientes submetidos à artroplastia total do joelho com e sem colocação de dreno de sucção six month follow-up of patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty with and without placement of suction drainage devices
Vol. 45 , No. 6 , pp. 549-553
639 views DOI Abstract
2010
efeito do macheamento do orifício piloto na resistência ao arrancamento e no torque de inserção dos parafusos pediculares com alma cônica effect of pilot hole tapping on pullout strength and insertional torque of dual core pedicle screws
Vol. 45 , No. 6 , pp. 565-568
550 views DOI Abstract
1988
Obstacles to developing vaccines for the Third World.
Vol. 259 , No. 5 , pp. 126-33
518 views
2010
resultado da reparação do manguito rotador em lesões do tipo c1 e c2 de snyder, considerando fumantes e não fumantes outcome of rotator cuff repair in snyder type c1 and c2 lesions, considering smokers and nonsmokers
Vol. 45 , No. 6 , pp. 554-556
472 views DOI Abstract
2008
análise biomecânica de variáveis relacionadas à resistência ao arrancamento dos parafusos do sistema de fixação vertebral biomechanical analysis of the variables related to the pullout strength of screws in the vertebral fixation system
Vol. 43 , No. 7 , pp. 293-299
419 views DOI Abstract
2009
tratamento do cotovelo rígido com artroplastia de interposição associada ao fixador externo articulado stiff elbow treatment by interposing arthroplasty associated to hinged external fixator
Vol. 44 , No. 4 , pp. 336-341
418 views DOI Abstract
2012
fraturas instáveis do fêmur em crianças tratadas com hastes intramedulares elásticas de titânio unstable femoral fractures treated with titanium elastic intramedullary nails, in children
Vol. 47 , No. 5 , pp. 575-580
410 views DOI Abstract
2009
fraturas do planalto tibial tibial plateau fractures
Vol. 44 , No. 6 , pp. 468-474
402 views DOI Abstract
2009
o papel do adesivo de fibrina e da sutura na fixação do transplante de menisco preservado por ultracongelamento em coelhos the role of fibrin glue and suture on the fixation of ultra frozen preserved meniscus transplantation in rabbits
Vol. 44 , No. 5 , pp. 397-403
401 views DOI Abstract
2014
dominance of foreign citations in brazilian orthopedics journals,
Vol. 49 , No. 6 , pp. 668-670
391 views DOI Abstract
2017
Postmodernism vs. Science.
Vol. 317 , No. 3 , pp. 90
261 views DOI
2016
evaluation of functional results from shoulders after arthroscopic repair of complete rotator cuff tears associated with traumatic anterior dislocation
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 163-168
227 views DOI Abstract
2015
anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a logical approach
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 469-471
168 views DOI Abstract
2015
hip salvage surgery in cerebral palsy cases: a systematic review
Vol. 50 , No. 3 , pp. 254-259
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
use of risedronate for consolidation and callus formation in colles fractures in postmenopausal women: solid study
Vol. 50 , No. 3 , pp. 274-282
297 views DOI Abstract
2015
avaliação da qualidade de vida submetidos à hemiartroplastia dos pacientes do quadril
Vol. 50 , No. 5 , pp. 530-536
304 views DOI Abstract
2015
femoropatellar radiographic alterations in cases of anterior cruciate ligament failure
Vol. 50 , No. 1 , pp. 43-49
143 views DOI Abstract
2015
acromioclavicular dislocation: postoperative evaluation of the coracoclavicular ligaments using magnetic resonance
Vol. 50 , No. 2 , pp. 195-199
230 views DOI Abstract
2014
ligamento anterolateral do joelho - visibilidade na ressonância nuclear magnética
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 98-99
141 views DOI
Journament Score
27.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,281 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.