Indexed in Journament

food and bioprocess technology

ISSN 1935-5130· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,666 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
72 Articles
Scores higher than 9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Kurzname food bioproc tech
Abgekürzter Name food bioproc tech
ISSN 1935-5130
URL http://www.springer.com/11947

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 11.1 25.8
Innovation 34.5 27.4
Community Impact 5.0 7.8
Content Distribution 71.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (72)

2018
Characterizing the pH-Dependent Release Kinetics of Food-Grade Spray Drying Encapsulated Iron Microcapsules for Food Fortification.
Pratap Singh, Anubhav;Siddiqui, Juveria;Diosady, Levente L;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 435-446
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Probing the Functionality of Bioactives from Eggplant Peel Extracts Through Extraction and Microencapsulation in Different Polymers and Whey Protein Hydrolysates
Condurache, N.
Vol. 12 , pp. 1316-1329
344 views DOI
2013
diagnÓstico socioeconÔmico e ambiental em microbacia hidrogrÁfica localizada em um nÚcleo de desertificaÇÃo
;Danilo Costa e Silva;Arthur Mattos
Vol. 14 , No. 45 , pp. -
314 views Abstract
2010
anÁlise de conflito entre legislaÇÃo e uso da terra: avaliaÇÃo das Áreas de preservaÇÃo permanente no municpio de itabira, mg
;Francisco de Assis Braga
Vol. 11 , No. 34 , pp. -
245 views Abstract
2015
consideraÇÕes sobre as cavernas quartzÍticas do parque estadual do ibitipoca, minas gerais, brasil
;Lilian Carla Moreira Bento;Luiz Eduardo Panisset Travassos;Silvio Carlos Rodrigues
Vol. 16 , No. 54 , pp. -
241 views Abstract
2020
Application of Fuzzy Logic in Sensory Evaluation of Food Products: a Comprehensive Study
Vivek, K.
Vol. 13 , pp. 0-0
239 views DOI
2012
o extremo sul da bahia que nÃo pertence a bahia
;Sebastião Pinheiro Gonçalves de Cerqueira Neto
Vol. 13 , No. 41 , pp. -
239 views Abstract
2011
condiÇÕes ambientais da fonte hÍdrica do municÍpio de braganÇa - amazÔnia oriental – brasil
;Silvia Clicia Corrêa dos Santos;Nelane Marques dda a Silva;Adryane Gorayeb;Luci Cajueiro Carneiro Pereira
Vol. 11 , No. 36 , pp. -
235 views Abstract
2012
edificaÇÕes e conforto tÉrmico: a moradia como fonte de aprendizagem
;Flávia de Oliveira Santos;Marilene Rodrigues dos Santos Pimentel
Vol. 13 , No. 44 , pp. -
230 views Abstract
2013
estimativa da carga orgÂnica e modelagem da autodepuraÇÃo dos efluentes de uma suinocultura no ribeirÃo vala do souza, jerÔnimo monteiro, estado do espÍrito santo
;Benvindo Sirtoli Gardiman Junior;Danilo Costa Fukunaga;Giovanni de Oliveira Garcia
Vol. 14 , No. 46 , pp. -
215 views Abstract
2022
Correction: Effect of Aeration Techniques on Flow Properties of Spray-Dried Sugar Powders — Process Optimization Studies (Food and Bioprocess Technology, (2022), 15, 9, (2114-2130), 10.1007/s11947-022-02854-9)
T, V.
Vol. 15 , pp. 2854
74 views DOI
2020
Application of Fuzzy Logic in Sensory Evaluation of Food Products: a Comprehensive Study
Vivek, K.
Vol. 13 , pp. 0-0
239 views DOI
2019
Probing the Functionality of Bioactives from Eggplant Peel Extracts Through Extraction and Microencapsulation in Different Polymers and Whey Protein Hydrolysates
Condurache, N.
Vol. 12 , pp. 1316-1329
344 views DOI
2018
Characterizing the pH-Dependent Release Kinetics of Food-Grade Spray Drying Encapsulated Iron Microcapsules for Food Fortification.
Pratap Singh, Anubhav;Siddiqui, Juveria;Diosady, Levente L;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 435-446
369 views DOI Abstract
2017
a relaÇÃo entre cidades-irmÃs na faixa de fronteira: o caso de cÁceres – mato grosso/brasil e san matÍas - bolÍvia
;Evaldo Ferreira
Vol. 18 , No. 62 , pp. 87-103
174 views Abstract
2016
estado, polÍticas pÚblicas e a agricultura no brasil: um espaÇo em permanente construÇÃo
;Carla Hentz;Carlos de Castro Neves Neto
Vol. 17 , No. 59 , pp. 244-260
99 views DOI Abstract
2016
os conhecimentos cartogrÁficos na prÁtica docente: um estudo com professores de geografia
;Aline Beatriz Ludwig;Ederson Nascimento
Vol. 17 , No. 60 , pp. 183-196
97 views DOI Abstract
2016
diagnÓstico de conectividad y accesibilidad de la red vial del cantÓn de san carlos, costa rica
;Diego Armando Cespedes Alvarez
Vol. 17 , No. 59 , pp. 261-278
142 views DOI Abstract
2016
carta do editor
;Paulo Cezar Mendes
Vol. 17 , No. 59 , pp. -
151 views
2016
corredores ecolÓgicos no brasil: avaliaÇÃo sobre os principais critÉrios utilizados para definiÇÃo de Áreas potenciais
;Vitor Hugo Campelo Pereira;Luiz Antonio Cestaro
Vol. 17 , No. 58 , pp. 16-33
177 views Abstract
Journament Score
25.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,666 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

34.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.