food and bioprocess technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#198 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

food and bioprocess technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name food bioproc tech
Abbreviated Name food bioproc tech
ISSN 1935-5130
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (72 total)

2019
Probing the Functionality of Bioactives from Eggplant Peel Extracts Through Extraction and Microencapsulation in Different Polymers and Whey Protein Hydrolysates
Condurache, N.
Vol. 12 , pp. 1316-1329
310 views DOI
2018
Characterizing the pH-Dependent Release Kinetics of Food-Grade Spray Drying Encapsulated Iron Microcapsules for Food Fortification.
Pratap Singh, Anubhav;Siddiqui, Juveria;Diosady, Levente L;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 435-446
307 views DOI Abstract
2013
diagnÓstico socioeconÔmico e ambiental em microbacia hidrogrÁfica localizada em um nÚcleo de desertificaÇÃo
;Danilo Costa e Silva;Arthur Mattos
Vol. 14 , No. 45 , pp. -
221 views Abstract
2010
anÁlise de conflito entre legislaÇÃo e uso da terra: avaliaÇÃo das Áreas de preservaÇÃo permanente no municpio de itabira, mg
;Francisco de Assis Braga
Vol. 11 , No. 34 , pp. -
216 views Abstract
2020
Application of Fuzzy Logic in Sensory Evaluation of Food Products: a Comprehensive Study
Vivek, K.
Vol. 13 , pp. 0-0
203 views DOI
2015
consideraÇÕes sobre as cavernas quartzÍticas do parque estadual do ibitipoca, minas gerais, brasil
;Lilian Carla Moreira Bento;Luiz Eduardo Panisset Travassos;Silvio Carlos Rodrigues
Vol. 16 , No. 54 , pp. -
186 views Abstract
2011
condiÇÕes ambientais da fonte hÍdrica do municÍpio de braganÇa - amazÔnia oriental – brasil
;Silvia Clicia Corrêa dos Santos;Nelane Marques dda a Silva;Adryane Gorayeb;Luci Cajueiro Carneiro Pereira
Vol. 11 , No. 36 , pp. -
186 views Abstract
2011
estudo morfolÓgico e climÁtico dos municÍpios da regiÃo
;Elizabeth Dell’ Orto e Silva;Alexandre Rosa dos Santos;Kmila Gomes da Silva
Vol. 12 , No. 39 , pp. -
183 views Abstract
2013
estimativa da carga orgÂnica e modelagem da autodepuraÇÃo dos efluentes de uma suinocultura no ribeirÃo vala do souza, jerÔnimo monteiro, estado do espÍrito santo
;Benvindo Sirtoli Gardiman Junior;Danilo Costa Fukunaga;Giovanni de Oliveira Garcia
Vol. 14 , No. 46 , pp. -
182 views Abstract
2012
edificaÇÕes e conforto tÉrmico: a moradia como fonte de aprendizagem
;Flávia de Oliveira Santos;Marilene Rodrigues dos Santos Pimentel
Vol. 13 , No. 44 , pp. -
178 views Abstract
View All 72 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.