food packaging and shelf life | Journament

Journal Ranking

#661 / 33,957
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

food packaging and shelf life

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name food packaging and shelf life
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 2214-2894
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/food-packaging-and-shelf-life
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2017
Effects of a natural bioactive coating on the quality and shelf life prolongation at different storage conditions of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) cv. Hass
Aguirre-Joya J.
Vol. 14 , pp. 102-107
395 views DOI
2014
formative evaluation of clinician experience with integrating family history-based clinical decision support into clinical practice
;Megan Doerr;Emily Edelman;Emily Gabitzsch;Charis Eng;Kathryn Teng
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 115-136
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preparation of zein nanofibers with cinnamaldehyde encapsulated in surfactants at critical micelle concentration for active food packaging
Shao, P.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
305 views DOI
2019
Bioactive constituents and bio-waste derived chitosan / xylan based biodegradable hybrid nanocomposite for sensitive detection of fish freshness
Vadivel, M.
Vol. 22 , pp. 0-0
280 views DOI
2018
ten years’ experience with the cyp2d6 activity score: a perspective on future investigations to improve clinical predictions for precision therapeutics
;Andrea Gaedigk;Jean C. Dinh;Hyunyoung Jeong;Bhagwat Prasad;J. Steven Leeder
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 15-
264 views DOI Abstract
2012
developing a prototype system for integrating pharmacogenomics findings into clinical practice
;Casey Lynnette Overby;Peter Tarczy-Hornoch;Ira J. Kalet;Kenneth E. Thummel;Joe W. Smith;Guilherme Del Fiol;David Fenstermacher;Emily Beth Devine
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 241-256
253 views DOI Abstract
2015
establishing and sustaining a prospective screening program for breast cancer-related lymphedema at the massachusetts general hospital: lessons learned
;Cheryl Brunelle;Melissa Skolny;Chantal Ferguson;Meyha Swaroop;Jean O'Toole;Alphonse G. Taghian
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 153-164
237 views DOI Abstract
2018
acknowledgement to reviewers of journal of personalized medicine in 2017
;Journal of Personalized Medicine Editorial Office
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
229 views DOI Abstract
2018
ethical considerations related to return of results from genomic medicine projects: the emerge network (phase iii) experience
;Robyn Fossey;David Kochan;Erin Winkler;Joel E. Pacyna;Janet Olson;Stephen Thibodeau;John J. Connolly;Margaret Harr;Meckenzie A. Behr;Cynthia A. Prows;Beth Cobb;Melanie F. Myers;Nancy D. Leslie;Bahram Namjou-Khales;Hila Milo Rasouly;Julia Wynn;Alexander Fedotov;Wendy K. Chung;Ali Gharavi;Janet L. Williams;Lynn Pais;Ingrid Holm;Sharon Aufox;Maureen E. Smith;Aaron Scrol;Kathleen Leppig;Gail P. Jarvik;Georgia L. Wiesner;Rongling Li;Mary Stroud;Jordan W. Smoller;Richard R. Sharp;Iftikhar J. Kullo
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 2-
225 views DOI Abstract
2012
teenagers as a moving target: how can teenagers be encouraged to accept treatment?
;Jean-Michel Cardot;Pascale Gauthier
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 277-286
225 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.