acknowledgement to reviewers of journal of personalized medicine in 2017
Clicks: 288
ID: 232428
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
288 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #8 of 14 articles by views in food packaging and shelf life
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Peer review is an essential part in the publication process, ensuring that Journal of Personalized Medicine maintains high quality standards for its published papers.[...]
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (24 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
office2018journalacknowledgement
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Journal of Personalized Medicine Editorial Office |
| Journal | food packaging and shelf life |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
10.3390/jpm8010005
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.