postharvest biology and technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#304 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

postharvest biology and technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name postharvest biol technol
Abbreviated Name postharvest biol technol
ISSN 0925-5214
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/postharvest-biology-and-technology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2019
Effects of chitosan treatment on avocado postharvest diseases and expression of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, chitinase and lipoxygenase genes
Obianom C.
Vol. 147 , pp. 214-221
463 views DOI
2018
Stalk length affects the mineral distribution and floret quality of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) heads during storage
Guo Y.
Vol. 145 , pp. 166-171
380 views DOI
2017
Impact of controlled atmosphere scheduling on strawberry and imported avocado fruit
Alamar M.
Vol. 134 , pp. 76-86
352 views DOI
2018
Maturity, storage and ripening effects on anti-fungal compounds in the skin of ‘Hass’ avocado fruit
Bowen J.
Vol. 146 , pp. 43-50
321 views DOI
2010
Evaluation of Lippia scaberrima essential oil and some pure terpenoid constituents as postharvest mycobiocides for avocado fruit
Regnier T.
Vol. 57 , pp. 176-182
309 views DOI
2020
Analysis of transcriptome and phytohormone profiles reveal novel insight into ginger (Zingiber officinale Rose) in response to postharvest dehydration stress
Li, H.
Vol. 161 , pp. 0-0
307 views DOI
2018
Genes differentially expressed in broccoli as an early and late response to wounding stress
Torres-Contreras A.
Vol. 145 , pp. 172-182
304 views DOI
2020
Evaluation of image processing technique as an expert system in mulberry fruit grading based on ripeness level using artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machine (SVM)
Azarmdel, H.
Vol. 166 , pp. 0-0
278 views DOI
2020
Seasonal and temporal changes during storage affect quality attributes of green asparagus.
Anastasiadi, Maria;Collings, Emma R;Shivembe, Allan;Qian, Binghua;Terry, Leon A;
Vol. 159 , pp. 111017
272 views DOI Abstract
2015
Heat acclimation reduces postharvest loss of table grapes during cold storage - analysis of possible mechanisms involved through a proteomic approach
Wu, Z.
Vol. 105 , pp. 26-33
254 views DOI
View All 23 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.