Indexed in Journament

j am med assoc

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,544 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
23 Articles
Scores higher than 87.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j am med assoc

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 79.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for j am med assoc
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 4.3 5.8
Content Distribution 79.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

1987
Standardization of bacterial culture for the disc diffusion assay
Vol. 49 , pp. 1176-1178
350 views
2017
optimization of electrodeposition parameters to increase <sup>99m</sup>tc radioactive concentration
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 27-33
341 views DOI Abstract
2011
effectiveness of gamma irradiation for decontamination of microbes on tea parasite herb scurrula atropurpurea (bl.) dans
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 107-112
320 views Abstract
2007
2006
the influence of platinum dopant on the characteristics of sno2thin film for gas sensor application
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 65-79
311 views DOI Abstract
2016
uptake and cytotoxicity characterization of radioiodine in mcf-7 and skbr3 breast cancer cell lines
Vol. 42 , No. 3 , pp. 145-149
310 views DOI Abstract
2015
2017
biological dosimetry using micronucleus assay in simulated partial-body exposure to ionizing radiation
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 75-80
265 views DOI Abstract
2017
effects of cooling fluid flow rate on the critical heat flux and flow stability in the plate fuel type 2 mw triga reactor
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 149-155
208 views DOI Abstract
2017
behavior of <sup>137</sup>cs activity in the sayung waters, demak, indonesia
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 41-46
232 views DOI Abstract
2017
thermal hydraulic modeling of once-through steam generator by two-fluid u-tube steam generator code
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 145-148
183 views DOI Abstract
2017
optimization of electrodeposition parameters to increase <sup>99m</sup>tc radioactive concentration
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 27-33
341 views DOI Abstract
2016
temperature dependence of the primary species yields of liquid water radiolysis by 0.8-mev fast neutrons
Vol. 42 , No. 1 , pp. 13-18
259 views DOI Abstract
2016
uptake and cytotoxicity characterization of radioiodine in mcf-7 and skbr3 breast cancer cell lines
Vol. 42 , No. 3 , pp. 145-149
310 views DOI Abstract
2015
2014
Journament Score
38.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,544 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.